Abstract
BACKGROUND: The decision of whether to continue oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) after successful surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation is challenging, and current guidelines provide no specific recommendations on whether or not it is safe to terminate OAT. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess long-term outcomes in patients who either did or did not, receive OAT after surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.
METHODS: In a prospective follow-up study, patients were included if surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation concomitantly with other cardiac surgery was done, between 2004 and 2018 at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. After 12 months, OAT was discontinued if: (a) sinus rhythm was documented by electrocardiogram, (b) atrial fibrillation was absent on 5-day Holter monitoring, (c) CHADS2 score ≤2, and (d) no other indications for OAT were present. Follow-up was ended in April 2019.
RESULTS: A total of 560 patients underwent surgical ablation of which 436 patients reached the baseline at 12 months; 286 patients received OAT, and 150 had OAT discontinued. Survival analysis revealed no differences between the two groups (P = .723). Mean survival time in the group receiving OAT was 5.3 ± 3.3 years, compared to 5.1 ± 3.0 years in the group where OAT was discontinued (P = .784). There was no difference in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events between the two groups (P = .846).
CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of OAT is safe in patients with a CHADS2 score ≤2 following successful surgical ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion. This conclusion needs to be confirmed in randomized trials.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Journal of Cardiac Surgery |
| Vol/bind | 35 |
| Nummer | 9 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 2216-2223 |
| Antal sider | 8 |
| ISSN | 0886-0440 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 2020 |