Aarhus Universitets segl

De-politicization of digital systems for trade facilitation at the port of tema: A soft systems methodology approach

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

De-politicization of digital systems for trade facilitation at the port of tema : A soft systems methodology approach. / Aryee, Jonas Nii Ayi; Hansen, Annette Skovsted.

I: Case Studies on Transport Policy, Bind 10, Nr. 1, 03.2022, s. 105-117.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Aryee JNA, Hansen AS. De-politicization of digital systems for trade facilitation at the port of tema: A soft systems methodology approach. Case Studies on Transport Policy. 2022 mar.;10(1):105-117. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.11.009

Author

Aryee, Jonas Nii Ayi ; Hansen, Annette Skovsted. / De-politicization of digital systems for trade facilitation at the port of tema : A soft systems methodology approach. I: Case Studies on Transport Policy. 2022 ; Bind 10, Nr. 1. s. 105-117.

Bibtex

@article{04efa00e94df46148351820ea348964b,
title = "De-politicization of digital systems for trade facilitation at the port of tema: A soft systems methodology approach",
abstract = "The Ghana National Single Window has become the focus of attention over its potential to move goods swiftly. However, since its inception in 2002, the controversies surrounding the implementation suggest issues beyond trade facilitation. The Information Systems literature primarily ascribes the controversies to resistance to technology. By adopting the Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) as a learning process for understanding port stakeholders' relations and attitudes, we explore the controversies to determine the meanings port stakeholders attribute to them. We combined SSM with interviews, media content analysis and focus groups made possible by snowballing. The responses were analyzed using rich pictures and validated through a conceptual model. The results reveal a fragmented government where ministries, agencies, and personalities assert power in single window implementation through I.T. vendor contracts. The situation results in a high cost of doing business at the port for shippers due to non-transparent and questionable contracts. The public's attitude towards the controversies reflects fears, hopes and expectations and legitimate concerns about important political and social goals. Using SSMs focus on relations and attitudes, we can document how controversies attributed to new technology is not a question of technology but of perceived political interference.",
keywords = "Maritime industry, Politicization, Ports, Single window, Soft systems methodology",
author = "Aryee, {Jonas Nii Ayi} and Hansen, {Annette Skovsted}",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.cstp.2021.11.009",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "105--117",
journal = "Case Studies on Transport Policy",
issn = "2213-624X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - De-politicization of digital systems for trade facilitation at the port of tema

T2 - A soft systems methodology approach

AU - Aryee, Jonas Nii Ayi

AU - Hansen, Annette Skovsted

PY - 2022/3

Y1 - 2022/3

N2 - The Ghana National Single Window has become the focus of attention over its potential to move goods swiftly. However, since its inception in 2002, the controversies surrounding the implementation suggest issues beyond trade facilitation. The Information Systems literature primarily ascribes the controversies to resistance to technology. By adopting the Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) as a learning process for understanding port stakeholders' relations and attitudes, we explore the controversies to determine the meanings port stakeholders attribute to them. We combined SSM with interviews, media content analysis and focus groups made possible by snowballing. The responses were analyzed using rich pictures and validated through a conceptual model. The results reveal a fragmented government where ministries, agencies, and personalities assert power in single window implementation through I.T. vendor contracts. The situation results in a high cost of doing business at the port for shippers due to non-transparent and questionable contracts. The public's attitude towards the controversies reflects fears, hopes and expectations and legitimate concerns about important political and social goals. Using SSMs focus on relations and attitudes, we can document how controversies attributed to new technology is not a question of technology but of perceived political interference.

AB - The Ghana National Single Window has become the focus of attention over its potential to move goods swiftly. However, since its inception in 2002, the controversies surrounding the implementation suggest issues beyond trade facilitation. The Information Systems literature primarily ascribes the controversies to resistance to technology. By adopting the Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) as a learning process for understanding port stakeholders' relations and attitudes, we explore the controversies to determine the meanings port stakeholders attribute to them. We combined SSM with interviews, media content analysis and focus groups made possible by snowballing. The responses were analyzed using rich pictures and validated through a conceptual model. The results reveal a fragmented government where ministries, agencies, and personalities assert power in single window implementation through I.T. vendor contracts. The situation results in a high cost of doing business at the port for shippers due to non-transparent and questionable contracts. The public's attitude towards the controversies reflects fears, hopes and expectations and legitimate concerns about important political and social goals. Using SSMs focus on relations and attitudes, we can document how controversies attributed to new technology is not a question of technology but of perceived political interference.

KW - Maritime industry

KW - Politicization

KW - Ports

KW - Single window

KW - Soft systems methodology

U2 - 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.11.009

DO - 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.11.009

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 105

EP - 117

JO - Case Studies on Transport Policy

JF - Case Studies on Transport Policy

SN - 2213-624X

IS - 1

ER -