Degrees of Disrespect:: How Only Extreme and Rare Incivility Alienates the Base

Rasmus Skytte

doi:10.1086/717852

Degrees of Disrespect: How Only Extreme and Rare Incivility Alienates the Base

Institut for Statskundskab

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

12 Citationer (Scopus)

58 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

When evaluating their own politicians, do partisans tolerate or punish the incivility now common in political discourse? While the answer is crucial to understand rising incivility, prior findings are mixed. I propose that copartisans tolerate milder degrees of incivility, which out-partisans punish, but that a limit exists beyond which the rhetoric becomes too extreme for even the base. Consequently, to examine whether copartisans tolerate or punish the incivility in current discourse, we must compare (1) how strong of an incivility they will tolerate to (2) how strong the incivility in current discourse is. To make this comparison, I develop a method integrating survey experiments with crowdsourced content analysis, which maps stimuli onto the distribution of online incivility among Congress members. I find that copartisans tolerate typical degrees of incivility, as the incivility in current discourse is rarely so extreme that favorability among copartisans drops. However, typical degrees lower out-party favorability, reinforcing polarization.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	The Journal of Politics
Vol/bind	84
Nummer	3
Sider (fra-til)	1746-1759
Antal sider	14
ISSN	0022-3816
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1086/717852
Status	Udgivet - jul. 2022

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1086/717852

Degrees of Disrespect_Accepted manuscript_2022Accepteret manuskript, 1,23 MBLicens: CC BY-NC

Citationsformater

@article{6ed087f669eb4babbd150145796ef20f,

title = "Degrees of Disrespect:: How Only Extreme and Rare Incivility Alienates the Base",

abstract = "When evaluating their own politicians, do partisans tolerate or punish the incivility now common in political discourse? While the answer is crucial to understand rising incivility, prior findings are mixed. I propose that copartisans tolerate milder degrees of incivility, which out-partisans punish, but that a limit exists beyond which the rhetoric becomes too extreme for even the base. Consequently, to examine whether copartisans tolerate or punish the incivility in current discourse, we must compare (1) how strong of an incivility they will tolerate to (2) how strong the incivility in current discourse is. To make this comparison, I develop a method integrating survey experiments with crowdsourced content analysis, which maps stimuli onto the distribution of online incivility among Congress members. I find that copartisans tolerate typical degrees of incivility, as the incivility in current discourse is rarely so extreme that favorability among copartisans drops. However, typical degrees lower out-party favorability, reinforcing polarization.",

keywords = "HOUSE, PARTISANSHIP, PERCEPTIONS, PUBLIC-OPINION, crowdsourcing, experiments, external validity, incivility, polarization",

author = "Rasmus Skytte",

year = "2022",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1086/717852",

language = "English",

volume = "84",

pages = "1746--1759",

journal = "The Journal of Politics",

issn = "0022-3816",

publisher = "University of Chicago Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Degrees of Disrespect:

T2 - How Only Extreme and Rare Incivility Alienates the Base

AU - Skytte, Rasmus

PY - 2022/7

Y1 - 2022/7

N2 - When evaluating their own politicians, do partisans tolerate or punish the incivility now common in political discourse? While the answer is crucial to understand rising incivility, prior findings are mixed. I propose that copartisans tolerate milder degrees of incivility, which out-partisans punish, but that a limit exists beyond which the rhetoric becomes too extreme for even the base. Consequently, to examine whether copartisans tolerate or punish the incivility in current discourse, we must compare (1) how strong of an incivility they will tolerate to (2) how strong the incivility in current discourse is. To make this comparison, I develop a method integrating survey experiments with crowdsourced content analysis, which maps stimuli onto the distribution of online incivility among Congress members. I find that copartisans tolerate typical degrees of incivility, as the incivility in current discourse is rarely so extreme that favorability among copartisans drops. However, typical degrees lower out-party favorability, reinforcing polarization.

AB - When evaluating their own politicians, do partisans tolerate or punish the incivility now common in political discourse? While the answer is crucial to understand rising incivility, prior findings are mixed. I propose that copartisans tolerate milder degrees of incivility, which out-partisans punish, but that a limit exists beyond which the rhetoric becomes too extreme for even the base. Consequently, to examine whether copartisans tolerate or punish the incivility in current discourse, we must compare (1) how strong of an incivility they will tolerate to (2) how strong the incivility in current discourse is. To make this comparison, I develop a method integrating survey experiments with crowdsourced content analysis, which maps stimuli onto the distribution of online incivility among Congress members. I find that copartisans tolerate typical degrees of incivility, as the incivility in current discourse is rarely so extreme that favorability among copartisans drops. However, typical degrees lower out-party favorability, reinforcing polarization.

KW - HOUSE

KW - PARTISANSHIP

KW - PERCEPTIONS

KW - PUBLIC-OPINION

KW - crowdsourcing

KW - experiments

KW - external validity

KW - incivility

KW - polarization

U2 - 10.1086/717852

DO - 10.1086/717852

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0022-3816

VL - 84

SP - 1746

EP - 1759

JO - The Journal of Politics

JF - The Journal of Politics

IS - 3

ER -

Degrees of Disrespect: How Only Extreme and Rare Incivility Alienates the Base

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater