Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Review › Forskning › peer review
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations. / Lunardi, Mattia; Louvard, Yves; Lefèvre, Thierry et al.
I: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Bind 80, Nr. 1, 07.2022, s. 63-88.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Review › Forskning › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
AU - Lunardi, Mattia
AU - Louvard, Yves
AU - Lefèvre, Thierry
AU - Stankovic, Goran
AU - Burzotta, Francesco
AU - Kassab, Ghassan S
AU - Lassen, Jens F
AU - Darremont, Olivier
AU - Garg, Scot
AU - Koo, Bon-Kwon
AU - Holm, Niels R
AU - Johnson, Thomas W
AU - Pan, Manuel
AU - Chatzizisis, Yiannis S
AU - Banning, Adrian
AU - Chieffo, Alaide
AU - Dudek, Dariusz
AU - Hildick-Smith, David
AU - Garot, Jérome
AU - Henry, Timothy D
AU - Dangas, George
AU - Stone, Gregg W
AU - Krucoff, Mitchell W
AU - Cutlip, Donald
AU - Mehran, Roxana
AU - Wijns, William
AU - Sharif, Faisal
AU - Serruys, Patrick W
AU - Onuma, Yoshinobu
AU - Bifurcation Academic Research Consortium and European Bifurcation Club
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - The Bifurcation Academic Research Consortium (Bif-ARC) project originated from the need to overcome the paucity of standardization and comparability between studies involving bifurcation coronary lesions. This document is the result of a collaborative effort between academic research organizations and the most renowned interventional cardiology societies focused on bifurcation lesions in Europe, the United States, and Asia. This consensus provides standardized definitions for bifurcation lesions; the criteria to judge the side branch relevance; the procedural, mechanistic, and clinical endpoints for every type of bifurcation study; and the follow-up methods. Considering the complexity of bifurcation lesions and their evaluation, detailed instructions and technical aspects for site and core laboratory analysis of bifurcation lesions are also reported. The recommendations included within this consensus will facilitate pooled analyses and the effective comparison of data in the future, improving the clinical relevance of trials in bifurcation lesions, and the quality of care in this subset of patients.
AB - The Bifurcation Academic Research Consortium (Bif-ARC) project originated from the need to overcome the paucity of standardization and comparability between studies involving bifurcation coronary lesions. This document is the result of a collaborative effort between academic research organizations and the most renowned interventional cardiology societies focused on bifurcation lesions in Europe, the United States, and Asia. This consensus provides standardized definitions for bifurcation lesions; the criteria to judge the side branch relevance; the procedural, mechanistic, and clinical endpoints for every type of bifurcation study; and the follow-up methods. Considering the complexity of bifurcation lesions and their evaluation, detailed instructions and technical aspects for site and core laboratory analysis of bifurcation lesions are also reported. The recommendations included within this consensus will facilitate pooled analyses and the effective comparison of data in the future, improving the clinical relevance of trials in bifurcation lesions, and the quality of care in this subset of patients.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.024
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.024
M3 - Review
C2 - 35597684
VL - 80
SP - 63
EP - 88
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
SN - 0735-1097
IS - 1
ER -