Current state of knowledge on biological effects from contaminants on arctic wildlife and fish

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisReviewForskningpeer review

  • Rune Dietz
  • Robert J. Letcher
  • ,
  • Jean Pierre Desforges
  • Igor Eulaers
  • Christian Sonne
  • Simon Wilson
  • ,
  • Emilie Andersen-Ranberg
  • ,
  • Niladri Basu
  • ,
  • Benjamin D. Barst
  • ,
  • Jan Ove Bustnes
  • ,
  • Jenny Bytingsvik
  • ,
  • Tomasz M. Ciesielski
  • ,
  • Paul E. Drevnick
  • ,
  • Geir W. Gabrielsen
  • ,
  • Ane Haarr
  • ,
  • Ketil Hylland
  • ,
  • Milton Levin
  • ,
  • Melissa A. McKinney
  • ,
  • Rasmus Dyrmose Nørregaard
  • ,
  • Kathrine E. Pedersen
  • ,
  • Jennifer Provencher
  • ,
  • Sabrina Tartu
  • ,
  • Jon Aars
  • ,
  • Joshua T. Ackerman
  • ,
  • Aqqalu Rosing-Asvid
  • ,
  • Rob Barrett
  • ,
  • Anders Bignert
  • ,
  • Erik W. Born
  • ,
  • Marsha Branigan
  • ,
  • Birgit Braune
  • ,
  • Colleen E. Bryan
  • ,
  • Collin A. Eagles-Smith
  • ,
  • Marlene Evans
  • ,
  • Thomas J. Evans
  • ,
  • Aaron T. Fisk
  • ,
  • Mary Gamberg
  • ,
  • Kim Gustavson
  • C. Alex Hartman
  • ,
  • Björn Helander
  • ,
  • Mark P. Herzog
  • ,
  • Paul F. Hoekstra
  • ,
  • Magali Houde
  • ,
  • Katrin Hoydal
  • ,
  • Allyson K. Jackson
  • ,
  • John Kucklick
  • ,
  • Elisabeth Lie
  • ,
  • Lisa Loseto
  • ,
  • Mark L. Mallory
  • ,
  • Cecilie Miljeteig
  • ,
  • Anders Mosbech
  • Derek C.G. Muir
  • ,
  • Sanna Túni Nielsen
  • ,
  • Elizabeth Peacock
  • ,
  • Sara Pedro
  • ,
  • Sarah H. Peterson
  • ,
  • Anuschka Polder
  • ,
  • Frank F. Rigét
  • Pat Roach
  • ,
  • Halvor Saunes
  • ,
  • Mikkel Holger S. Sinding, University of Copenhagen, Tromsø University Museum
  • ,
  • Janneche U. Skaare
  • ,
  • Jens Søndergaard
  • Garry Stenson
  • ,
  • Gary Stern
  • ,
  • Gabriele Treu
  • ,
  • Stacy S. Schuur
  • ,
  • Gísli Víkingsson

Since the last Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) effort to review biological effects of the exposure to organohalogen compounds (OHCs) in Arctic biota, there has been a considerable number of new Arctic effect studies. Here, we provide an update on the state of the knowledge of OHC, and also include mercury, exposure and/or associated effects in key Arctic marine and terrestrial mammal and bird species as well as in fish by reviewing the literature published since the last AMAP assessment in 2010. We aimed at updating the knowledge of how single but also combined health effects are or can be associated to the exposure to single compounds or mixtures of OHCs. We also focussed on assessing both potential individual as well as population health impacts using population-specific exposure data post 2000. We have identified quantifiable effects on vitamin metabolism, immune functioning, thyroid and steroid hormone balances, oxidative stress, tissue pathology, and reproduction. As with the previous assessment, a wealth of documentation is available for biological effects in marine mammals and seabirds, and sentinel species such as the sledge dog and Arctic fox, but information for terrestrial vertebrates and fish remain scarce. While hormones and vitamins are thoroughly studied, oxidative stress, immunotoxic and reproductive effects need further investigation. Depending on the species and population, some OHCs and mercury tissue contaminant burdens post 2000 were observed to be high enough to exceed putative risk threshold levels that have been previously estimated for non-target species or populations outside the Arctic. In this assessment, we made use of risk quotient calculations to summarize the cumulative effects of different OHC classes and mercury for which critical body burdens can be estimated for wildlife across the Arctic. As our ultimate goal is to better predict or estimate the effects of OHCs and mercury in Arctic wildlife at the individual, population and ecosystem level, there remain numerous knowledge gaps on the biological effects of exposure in Arctic biota. These knowledge gaps include the establishment of concentration thresholds for individual compounds as well as for realistic cocktail mixtures that in fact indicate biologically relevant, and not statistically determined, health effects for specific species and subpopulations. Finally, we provide future perspectives on understanding Arctic wildlife health using new in vivo, in vitro, and in silico techniques, and provide case studies on multiple stressors to show that future assessments would benefit from significant efforts to integrate human health, wildlife ecology and retrospective and forecasting aspects into assessing the biological effects of OHC and mercury exposure in Arctic wildlife and fish.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer133792
TidsskriftScience of the total Environment
Vol/bind696
NummerDecember
ISSN0048-9697
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 15 dec. 2019

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 166615066