Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
Forlagets udgivne version
The degree of concentration in research funding has long been a principal matter of contention in science policy. Strong concentration has been seen as a tool for optimizing and focusing research investments but also as a damaging path towards hypercompetition, diminished diversity, and conservative topic selection. While several studies have documented funding concentration linked to individual funding organizations, few have looked at funding concentration from a systemic perspective. In this article, we examine nearly 20,000 competitive grants allocated by 15 major Danish research funders. Our results show a strongly skewed allocation of funding towards a small elite of individual researchers, and towards a select group of research areas and topics. We discuss potential drivers and highlight that funding concentration likely results from a complex interplay between funders’ overlapping priorities, excellence-dominated evaluation criteria, and lack of coordination between both public and private research funding bodies.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Quantitative Science Studies |
Vol/bind | 1 |
Nummer | 3 |
Sider (fra-til) | 1159-1181 |
Antal sider | 23 |
ISSN | 2641-3337 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 2020 |
Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater
ID: 190363744