Comparing Rape Myth Acceptance Among Police Trainees and Medical Students: A Preliminary Danish Validation of the Updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale

Marie Skov, Sarah van Mastrigt*, Andreas Videbæk Jensen

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

6 Citationer (Scopus)
98 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Identifying rape myths among criminal justice and medical professionals is central to preventing secondary victimization. We present the first preliminary Danish validation of McMahon and Farmer’s updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale using samples of police and medical trainees. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses result in a 14-item, four-factor measure that demonstrates acceptable model fit, satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity, and good internal consistency. Although reported rape myth acceptance is generally low in both samples, some subscale scores vary across professional groups, thereby identifying specific targets for intervention in different occupational contexts. Further tests of the scale are recommended.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftViolence Against Women
Vol/bind28
Nummer11
Sider (fra-til)2649-2676
Antal sider28
ISSN1077-8012
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2022

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Comparing Rape Myth Acceptance Among Police Trainees and Medical Students: A Preliminary Danish Validation of the Updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater