Comparative analysis of 12 different kits for bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free DNA

Bidragets oversatte titel: Sammenlignende analyse af 12 forskellige kits til bisulfitkonvertering af cirkulerende cellefrit DNA

Mai-Britt Worm Ørntoft, Sarah Østrup Jensen, Thomas Birkballe Hansen, Jesper Bertram Bramsen, Claus Lindbjerg Andersen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


Blood circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is becoming popular in the search of promising predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Among these biomarkers, cfDNA methylation markers have especially gained considerable attention. A significant challenge in the utilization of cfDNA methylation markers is the limited amount of cfDNA available for analyses; reportedly, bisulfite conversion (BSC) reduce cfDNA amounts even further. Nevertheless, few efforts have focused on ensuring high cfDNA conversion efficiency and recovery after BSC. To compare cfDNA recovery of different BSC methods, we compared 12 different commercially available BSC kits. We tested whether DNA recovery was affected by the molecular weight and/or quantity of input DNA. We also tested BSC efficiency for each kit. We found that recovery varied for DNA fragments of different lengths: certain kits recovered short fragments better than others, and only 3 kits recovered DNA fragments of <100 bp well. In contrast, DNA input amount did not seem to affect DNA recovery: for quantities spanning between 820 and ∼25,000 genome equivalents per BSC, a linear relation was found between input and recovery amount. Overall, mean recovery ranged between 9 and 32%, with BSC efficiency of 97–99.9%. When plasma cfDNA was used as input for BSC, recovery varied from 22% for the poorest and 66% for the best performing kits, while conversion efficiency ranged from 96 to 100% among different kits. In conclusion, clear performance differences exist between commercially available BSC kits, both in terms of DNA recovery and conversion efficiency. The choice of BSC kit can substantially impact the amount of converted cfDNA available for downstream analysis, which is critical in a cfDNA methylation marker setting.

Bidragets oversatte titelSammenlignende analyse af 12 forskellige kits til bisulfitkonvertering af cirkulerende cellefrit DNA
Sider (fra-til)626-636
Antal sider11
StatusUdgivet - 2017


Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Sammenlignende analyse af 12 forskellige kits til bisulfitkonvertering af cirkulerende cellefrit DNA'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.