Closed shutters or revolving doors? Elite career track similarity and elite sector transfers in Denmark

TY - JOUR

T1 - Closed shutters or revolving doors? Elite career track similarity and elite sector transfers in Denmark

AU - Binderkrantz, Anne Skorkjær

AU - Christensen, Jørgen Grønnegård

AU - Christiansen, Peter Munk

AU - Nielsen, Marie Kaldahl

AU - Pedersen, Helene Helboe

PY - 2024/8

Y1 - 2024/8

N2 - A crucial aspect of elite dominance in modern democracies concerns the degree to which different political elites share similar career paths and shifts between different elite positions. Similarity in career paths and transfers across elite positions are crucial aspects of elite dominance in modern democracies. This paper argues that there are limits to elite career similarity and sector transfer because of varying recruitment criteria and reputational cargo across different political elite groups. We argue that career similarity and transfers across elite positions are lower when recruitment criteria are exclusive. We also argue that acquired reputation may be a career liability limiting transfers into other elite groups. Empirically, we examine career trajectories and transfers across elite groups by mapping the full career of Members of the Parliament, top bureaucrats and interest group leaders in Denmark. We demonstrate that within the Danish political elite, career paths are relatively distinct and transfer few. Career distinctiveness and lack of elite transfers are especially pronounced for the bureaucratic elite, which is guarded by stricter recruitment criteria and on guard against reputations that might taint its image as a pure merit civil service. In contrast to other studies, our results suggest that the shutters between elite sectors are relatively closed. However, the few individuals passing through these most exclusive revolving doors may have a significant political impact.

AB - A crucial aspect of elite dominance in modern democracies concerns the degree to which different political elites share similar career paths and shifts between different elite positions. Similarity in career paths and transfers across elite positions are crucial aspects of elite dominance in modern democracies. This paper argues that there are limits to elite career similarity and sector transfer because of varying recruitment criteria and reputational cargo across different political elite groups. We argue that career similarity and transfers across elite positions are lower when recruitment criteria are exclusive. We also argue that acquired reputation may be a career liability limiting transfers into other elite groups. Empirically, we examine career trajectories and transfers across elite groups by mapping the full career of Members of the Parliament, top bureaucrats and interest group leaders in Denmark. We demonstrate that within the Danish political elite, career paths are relatively distinct and transfer few. Career distinctiveness and lack of elite transfers are especially pronounced for the bureaucratic elite, which is guarded by stricter recruitment criteria and on guard against reputations that might taint its image as a pure merit civil service. In contrast to other studies, our results suggest that the shutters between elite sectors are relatively closed. However, the few individuals passing through these most exclusive revolving doors may have a significant political impact.

KW - career track

KW - political elites

KW - recruitment

KW - revolvers

KW - revolving doors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173555848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6765.12627

DO - 10.1111/1475-6765.12627

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85173555848

SN - 0304-4130

VL - 63

SP - 1022

EP - 1041

JO - European Journal of Political Research

JF - European Journal of Political Research

IS - 3

ER -