TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda

AU - Thomas, Duncan Andrew

AU - Nevada, Maria

AU - Tirado, Mayra M.

AU - Jacob, Merle

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - The current range and volume of research evaluation-related literature is extensive and incorporates scholarly and policy/practice-related perspectives. This reflects academic and practical interest over many decades and trails the changing funding and reputational modalities for universities, namely increased selectivity applied to institutional research funding streams and the perceived importance of university rankings and other reputational devices. To make sense of this highly diverse body of literature, we undertake a critical review of over 350 works constituting, in our view, the 'state-of-the-art' on institutional performance-based research evaluation arrangements (PREAs). We focus on PREAs because they are becoming the predominant means worldwide to allocate research funds and accrue reputation for universities. We highlight the themes addressed in the literature and offer critical commentary on the balance of scholarly and policy/ practice-related orientations.We then reflect on five limitations to the state-of-the-art and propose a new agenda, and a change of perspective, to progress this area of research in future studies.

AB - The current range and volume of research evaluation-related literature is extensive and incorporates scholarly and policy/practice-related perspectives. This reflects academic and practical interest over many decades and trails the changing funding and reputational modalities for universities, namely increased selectivity applied to institutional research funding streams and the perceived importance of university rankings and other reputational devices. To make sense of this highly diverse body of literature, we undertake a critical review of over 350 works constituting, in our view, the 'state-of-the-art' on institutional performance-based research evaluation arrangements (PREAs). We focus on PREAs because they are becoming the predominant means worldwide to allocate research funds and accrue reputation for universities. We highlight the themes addressed in the literature and offer critical commentary on the balance of scholarly and policy/ practice-related orientations.We then reflect on five limitations to the state-of-the-art and propose a new agenda, and a change of perspective, to progress this area of research in future studies.

KW - Effects of research evaluation

KW - Performance-based research evaluation

KW - Performance-based research evaluation arrangements

KW - Research evaluation

U2 - 10.1093/reseval/rvaa008

DO - 10.1093/reseval/rvaa008

M3 - Journal article

VL - 29

SP - 275

EP - 288

JO - Research Evaluation

JF - Research Evaluation

SN - 0958-2029

IS - 3

ER -