Cardiovascular Effects of Increasing Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in A Model of Left Ventricular Cardiogenic Shock in Female Pigs

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiovascular Effects of Increasing Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in A Model of Left Ventricular Cardiogenic Shock in Female Pigs

AU - Hørsdal, Oskar Kjærgaard

AU - Wethelund, Kasper Lykke

AU - Gopalasingam, Nigopan

AU - Lyhne, Mads Dam

AU - Ellegaard, Mark Stoltenberg

AU - Møller-Helgestad, Ole Kristian

AU - Ravn, Hanne Berg

AU - Wiggers, Henrik

AU - Christensen, Steffen

AU - Berg-Hansen, Kristoffer

N1 - Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

PY - 2024/12/1

Y1 - 2024/12/1

N2 - Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) presents a medical challenge with limited treatment options. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during mechanical ventilation has been linked with clinical benefits in patients with CS. This study investigated whether increasing PEEP levels could unload the left ventricle (LV) in CS in a large animal model of LV-CS. Methods: Left ventricle cardiogenic shock was induced in 26 female pigs (60 kg) by microsphere injections into the left main coronary artery. In one study, protocol PEEP was increased (5, 10, and 15 cm H2O) and then reverted (15, 10, and 5 cm H2O) in 3-min intervals. In another protocol, PEEP increments with higher granularity were conducted through 3-min intervals (5, 8, 10, 13, and 15 cm H2O). Hemodynamic measurements were performed at all PEEP levels during a healthy state and in LV-CS with LV pressure–volume loops. The primary endpoint was pressure–volume area. Secondary endpoints included other mechanoenergetic parameters and estimates of LV preload and afterload. results: Cardiac output (CO) decreased significantly in LV-CS from 4.5 ± 1.0 to 3.1 ± 0.9 l/min (P < 0.001). Increasing PEEP resulted in lower pressure–volume area, demonstrating a 36 ± 3% decrease in the healthy state (P < 0.001) and 18 ± 3% in LV-CS (P < 0.001) at PEEP 15 cm H2O. These effects were highly reversible when PEEP was returned to 5 cm H2O. Although mean arterial pressure declined with higher PEEP, CO remained preserved during LV-CS (P = 0.339). Increasing PEEP caused reductions in key measures of LV preload and afterload during LV-CS. The right ventricular stroke work index was decreased with increased PEEP. Despite a minor increase in heart rate at PEEP levels of 15 cm H2O (71 beats/min vs. 75 beats/min, P < 0.05), total mechanical power expenditure (pressure–volume area normalized to heart rate) decreased at higher PEEP. Conclusions: Applying higher PEEP levels reduced pressure–volume area, preserving CO while decreasing mean arterial pressure. Positive end-expiratory pressure could be a viable LV unloading strategy if titrated optimally during LV-CS.

AB - Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) presents a medical challenge with limited treatment options. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during mechanical ventilation has been linked with clinical benefits in patients with CS. This study investigated whether increasing PEEP levels could unload the left ventricle (LV) in CS in a large animal model of LV-CS. Methods: Left ventricle cardiogenic shock was induced in 26 female pigs (60 kg) by microsphere injections into the left main coronary artery. In one study, protocol PEEP was increased (5, 10, and 15 cm H2O) and then reverted (15, 10, and 5 cm H2O) in 3-min intervals. In another protocol, PEEP increments with higher granularity were conducted through 3-min intervals (5, 8, 10, 13, and 15 cm H2O). Hemodynamic measurements were performed at all PEEP levels during a healthy state and in LV-CS with LV pressure–volume loops. The primary endpoint was pressure–volume area. Secondary endpoints included other mechanoenergetic parameters and estimates of LV preload and afterload. results: Cardiac output (CO) decreased significantly in LV-CS from 4.5 ± 1.0 to 3.1 ± 0.9 l/min (P < 0.001). Increasing PEEP resulted in lower pressure–volume area, demonstrating a 36 ± 3% decrease in the healthy state (P < 0.001) and 18 ± 3% in LV-CS (P < 0.001) at PEEP 15 cm H2O. These effects were highly reversible when PEEP was returned to 5 cm H2O. Although mean arterial pressure declined with higher PEEP, CO remained preserved during LV-CS (P = 0.339). Increasing PEEP caused reductions in key measures of LV preload and afterload during LV-CS. The right ventricular stroke work index was decreased with increased PEEP. Despite a minor increase in heart rate at PEEP levels of 15 cm H2O (71 beats/min vs. 75 beats/min, P < 0.05), total mechanical power expenditure (pressure–volume area normalized to heart rate) decreased at higher PEEP. Conclusions: Applying higher PEEP levels reduced pressure–volume area, preserving CO while decreasing mean arterial pressure. Positive end-expiratory pressure could be a viable LV unloading strategy if titrated optimally during LV-CS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202573788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005201

DO - 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005201

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 39186681

SN - 0003-3022

VL - 141

SP - 1105

EP - 1118

JO - Anesthesiology

JF - Anesthesiology

IS - 6

ER -