Institut for Statskundskab

Blurring Borders: Investigating the Western/Global South Identity of Human Security

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Blurring Borders : Investigating the Western/Global South Identity of Human Security. / Gelardi, Maiken.

I: Alternatives, Bind 45, Nr. 3, 08.2020, s. 143-161.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Gelardi, Maiken. / Blurring Borders : Investigating the Western/Global South Identity of Human Security. I: Alternatives. 2020 ; Bind 45, Nr. 3. s. 143-161.

Bibtex

@article{736fd5fd90ba4cf9a784f2f576e80de2,
title = "Blurring Borders: Investigating the Western/Global South Identity of Human Security",
abstract = "In the globalizing international relations (IR) debate, the “West” and “Global South” have conventionally been presented as fundamentally different categories. This has disguised any interconnectedness between the two categories and variation within them. What does this mean for the quest for “Global South theorizing?” In order to address this binary logic in the globalizing IR literature, I analyze the case of human security as an example of Global South theorizing. First, I disentangle the Western/Global South origins and inflection of the human security concept and find that there is Global South agency related to its conceptual development, but also Western inflections. Second, I examine and compare the apparent rejection of the concept in two regions of the Global South—Southeast Asia and Latin America—and find both similarities and differences in their disinterest in engaging with the concept. Curiously, the similarities lie in the positionality of these regions and their difference to the West. In this way, the article points to the danger of using these categories in a manner that reemphasizes binary logics and their constitutive effects, and it exposes the complexity regarding what we consider Global South and Global South theorizing.",
keywords = "Global South, globalizing IR, human security, international relations theory, Latin America",
author = "Maiken Gelardi",
year = "2020",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1177/0304375420929586",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "143--161",
journal = "Alternatives: Global, Local, Political",
issn = "0304-3754",
publisher = ": SAGE Publications ",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blurring Borders

T2 - Investigating the Western/Global South Identity of Human Security

AU - Gelardi, Maiken

PY - 2020/8

Y1 - 2020/8

N2 - In the globalizing international relations (IR) debate, the “West” and “Global South” have conventionally been presented as fundamentally different categories. This has disguised any interconnectedness between the two categories and variation within them. What does this mean for the quest for “Global South theorizing?” In order to address this binary logic in the globalizing IR literature, I analyze the case of human security as an example of Global South theorizing. First, I disentangle the Western/Global South origins and inflection of the human security concept and find that there is Global South agency related to its conceptual development, but also Western inflections. Second, I examine and compare the apparent rejection of the concept in two regions of the Global South—Southeast Asia and Latin America—and find both similarities and differences in their disinterest in engaging with the concept. Curiously, the similarities lie in the positionality of these regions and their difference to the West. In this way, the article points to the danger of using these categories in a manner that reemphasizes binary logics and their constitutive effects, and it exposes the complexity regarding what we consider Global South and Global South theorizing.

AB - In the globalizing international relations (IR) debate, the “West” and “Global South” have conventionally been presented as fundamentally different categories. This has disguised any interconnectedness between the two categories and variation within them. What does this mean for the quest for “Global South theorizing?” In order to address this binary logic in the globalizing IR literature, I analyze the case of human security as an example of Global South theorizing. First, I disentangle the Western/Global South origins and inflection of the human security concept and find that there is Global South agency related to its conceptual development, but also Western inflections. Second, I examine and compare the apparent rejection of the concept in two regions of the Global South—Southeast Asia and Latin America—and find both similarities and differences in their disinterest in engaging with the concept. Curiously, the similarities lie in the positionality of these regions and their difference to the West. In this way, the article points to the danger of using these categories in a manner that reemphasizes binary logics and their constitutive effects, and it exposes the complexity regarding what we consider Global South and Global South theorizing.

KW - Global South

KW - globalizing IR

KW - human security

KW - international relations theory

KW - Latin America

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097037447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0304375420929586

DO - 10.1177/0304375420929586

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85097037447

VL - 45

SP - 143

EP - 161

JO - Alternatives: Global, Local, Political

JF - Alternatives: Global, Local, Political

SN - 0304-3754

IS - 3

ER -