Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
Forlagets udgivne version
National and local governments need to step up efforts to effectively implement the post-2020 global biodiversity framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity to halt and reverse worsening biodiversity trends. Drawing on recent advances in interdisciplinary biodiversity science, we propose a framework for improved implementation by national and subnational governments. First, the identification of actions and the promotion of ownership across stakeholders need to recognize the multiple values of biodiversity and account for remote responsibility. Second, cross-sectorial implementation and mainstreaming should adopt scalable and multifunctional ecosystem restoration approaches and target positive futures for nature and people. Third, assessment of progress and adaptive management can be informed by novel biodiversity monitoring and modeling approaches handling the multidimensionality of biodiversity change.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Artikelnummer | e12848 |
Tidsskrift | Conservation Letters |
Vol/bind | 15 |
Nummer | 2 |
Antal sider | 16 |
ISSN | 1755-263X |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - mar. 2022 |
Funding Information:
This work is based on a workshop funded by iDiv via the German Research Foundation (DFG FZT 118 and 202548816). Special thanks to Gabriele Rada for help with the figure.
Funding Information:
Detailed plans for both active restoration and passive rewilding will need to be developed together with all stakeholders and funded. Innovative conservation finance mechanisms could leverage funding from impact investors to support biodiversity‐sound businesses and restoration interventions by nongovernmental organizations (Bos et al., 2015 ; Deutz et al., 2020 ; World Bank, 2020 ). Compliance of different stakeholders in each country could be fostered by rewarding those that implement commitments and penalizing those that have not. For instance, fiscal transfers to municipalities can depend on the level of implementation of protected areas and other biodiversity conservation measures (Brito, 2020 ; Tacconi et al., 2019 ), and governments should tax businesses for externality costs of biodiversity‐adverse actions. Some countries, for example, Mexico, Portugal, and Brazil financially reward municipalities that designate land for ecosystem service provision or biodiversity protection (OECD, 2020 ; Ring, 2008 ; Santos et al., 2012 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals LLC
Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater
ID: 227318899