Avoiding or Engaging Problems? Issue Ownership, Problem Indicators, and Party Issue Competition

Thomas Artmann Kristensen, Christoffer Green-Pedersen, Peter Bjerre Mortensen, Henrik Bech Seeberg*

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

8 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Issue competition theories posit that political parties have little incentive to emphasize the same issues, because they mostly benefit from emphasizing issues where they are viewed as more competent. In contrast, a number of empirical studies find considerable overlap in parties’ issues emphasis. Aiming to bridge this peculiar gap, this paper suggests that the development of exogenous problems is one factor that constrains parties’ incentives to talk past each other. Using comprehensive data on party attention to ten issues across six West European countries from approximately 1980 and onwards, the analysis shows that problems moderate the relationship between parties’ issue reputations and their issue emphases. When problems are moderate, parties selectively focus on different issues, but when problems become severe, parties across the board attend to an issue. That even includes parties that do not own the issue. These results have reassuring implications for parties’ responsiveness to societal problems that negatively affect the welfare of citizens.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of European Public Policy
Vol/bind30
Nummer12
Sider (fra-til)2854-2885
Antal sider32
ISSN1350-1763
DOI
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2023

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Avoiding or Engaging Problems? Issue Ownership, Problem Indicators, and Party Issue Competition'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater