Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia

Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; José Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Hans Spoolder; Karl Ståhl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Simon Gubbins; Jan Arend Stegeman; François Thiaucourt; Sotiria-Eleni Antoniou; Inma Aznar; Alexandra Papanikolaou; Gabriele Zancanaro; Helen Clare Roberts; EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)

doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7068

Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia

Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, José Luis Gonzales Rojas, Christian Gortázar, Mette Herskin, Virginie Michel, Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca, Barbara Padalino, Paolo Pasquali, Hans Spoolder, Karl Ståhl, Antonio Velarde, Arvo Viltrop, Christoph Winckler, Simon GubbinsJan Arend Stegeman, François Thiaucourt, Sotiria-Eleni Antoniou, Inma Aznar, Alexandra Papanikolaou, Gabriele Zancanaro, Helen Clare Roberts, EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)

Institut for Husdyr- og Veterinærvidenskab - ANIVET Adfærd, Stress og Dyrevelfærd (BSW)

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

3 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law'). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia (CCPP). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period, (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones and iv) the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Different clinical and laboratory sampling procedures are proposed depending on the scenarios considered. The monitoring period of 45 days was assessed as effective in affected areas where high awareness is expected, and when the index case occurs in an area where the awareness is low the monitoring period should be at least 180 days (6 months). Since transmission kernels do not exist and data to estimate transmission kernels are not available, a surveillance zone of 3 km was considered effective based on expert knowledge, while a protection zone should also be developed to include establishments adjacent to affected ones. Recommendations, provided for each of the scenarios assessed, aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to CCPP.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Artikelnummer	e07068
Tidsskrift	EFSA Journal
Vol/bind	20
Nummer	1
ISSN	1831-4732
DOI	https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7068
Status	Udgivet - jan. 2022

Adgang til dokumentet

10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7068Licens: CC BY-ND

Andre filer og links

Link to publication in Scopus

Citationsformater

Nielsen, S. S., Alvarez, J., Bicout, D. J., Calistri, P., Canali, E., Drewe, J. A., Garin-Bastuji, B., Gonzales Rojas, J. L., Gortázar, C., Herskin, M., Michel, V., Miranda Chueca, M. Á., Padalino, B., Pasquali, P., Spoolder, H., Ståhl, K., Velarde, A., Viltrop, A., Winckler, C., ... EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) (2022). Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia. EFSA Journal, 20(1), Artikel e07068. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7068

@article{b17be4ff99aa4ac7a54bbd62979dc77a,

title = "Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia",

abstract = "EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law'). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia (CCPP). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period, (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones and iv) the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Different clinical and laboratory sampling procedures are proposed depending on the scenarios considered. The monitoring period of 45 days was assessed as effective in affected areas where high awareness is expected, and when the index case occurs in an area where the awareness is low the monitoring period should be at least 180 days (6 months). Since transmission kernels do not exist and data to estimate transmission kernels are not available, a surveillance zone of 3 km was considered effective based on expert knowledge, while a protection zone should also be developed to include establishments adjacent to affected ones. Recommendations, provided for each of the scenarios assessed, aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to CCPP.",

keywords = "Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia, Disease control measures, Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae, monitoring period, protection zone, sampling procedures, surveillance zone",

author = "Nielsen, {S{\o}ren Saxmose} and Julio Alvarez and Bicout, {Dominique Joseph} and Paolo Calistri and Elisabetta Canali and Drewe, {Julian Ashley} and Bruno Garin-Bastuji and {Gonzales Rojas}, {Jos{\'e} Luis} and Christian Gort{\'a}zar and Mette Herskin and Virginie Michel and {Miranda Chueca}, {Miguel {\'A}ngel} and Barbara Padalino and Paolo Pasquali and Hans Spoolder and Karl St{\aa}hl and Antonio Velarde and Arvo Viltrop and Christoph Winckler and Simon Gubbins and Stegeman, {Jan Arend} and Fran{\c c}ois Thiaucourt and Sotiria-Eleni Antoniou and Inma Aznar and Alexandra Papanikolaou and Gabriele Zancanaro and Roberts, {Helen Clare} and {EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)}",

year = "2022",

month = jan,

doi = "10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7068",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

journal = "EFSA Journal",

issn = "1831-4732",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

number = "1",

}

Nielsen, SS, Alvarez, J, Bicout, DJ, Calistri, P, Canali, E, Drewe, JA, Garin-Bastuji, B, Gonzales Rojas, JL, Gortázar, C, Herskin, M, Michel, V, Miranda Chueca, MÁ, Padalino, B, Pasquali, P, Spoolder, H, Ståhl, K, Velarde, A, Viltrop, A, Winckler, C, Gubbins, S, Stegeman, JA, Thiaucourt, F, Antoniou, S-E, Aznar, I, Papanikolaou, A, Zancanaro, G, Roberts, HC & EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) 2022, 'Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia', EFSA Journal, bind 20, nr. 1, e07068. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7068

Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia. / Nielsen, Søren Saxmose; Alvarez, Julio; Bicout, Dominique Joseph et al.
I: EFSA Journal, Bind 20, Nr. 1, e07068, 01.2022.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law

T2 - Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia

AU - Nielsen, Søren Saxmose

AU - Alvarez, Julio

AU - Bicout, Dominique Joseph

AU - Calistri, Paolo

AU - Canali, Elisabetta

AU - Drewe, Julian Ashley

AU - Garin-Bastuji, Bruno

AU - Gonzales Rojas, José Luis

AU - Gortázar, Christian

AU - Herskin, Mette

AU - Michel, Virginie

AU - Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel

AU - Padalino, Barbara

AU - Pasquali, Paolo

AU - Spoolder, Hans

AU - Ståhl, Karl

AU - Velarde, Antonio

AU - Viltrop, Arvo

AU - Winckler, Christoph

AU - Gubbins, Simon

AU - Stegeman, Jan Arend

AU - Thiaucourt, François

AU - Antoniou, Sotiria-Eleni

AU - Aznar, Inma

AU - Papanikolaou, Alexandra

AU - Zancanaro, Gabriele

AU - Roberts, Helen Clare

AU - EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)

PY - 2022/1

Y1 - 2022/1

N2 - EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law'). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia (CCPP). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period, (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones and iv) the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Different clinical and laboratory sampling procedures are proposed depending on the scenarios considered. The monitoring period of 45 days was assessed as effective in affected areas where high awareness is expected, and when the index case occurs in an area where the awareness is low the monitoring period should be at least 180 days (6 months). Since transmission kernels do not exist and data to estimate transmission kernels are not available, a surveillance zone of 3 km was considered effective based on expert knowledge, while a protection zone should also be developed to include establishments adjacent to affected ones. Recommendations, provided for each of the scenarios assessed, aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to CCPP.

AB - EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law'). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia (CCPP). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period, (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones and iv) the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Different clinical and laboratory sampling procedures are proposed depending on the scenarios considered. The monitoring period of 45 days was assessed as effective in affected areas where high awareness is expected, and when the index case occurs in an area where the awareness is low the monitoring period should be at least 180 days (6 months). Since transmission kernels do not exist and data to estimate transmission kernels are not available, a surveillance zone of 3 km was considered effective based on expert knowledge, while a protection zone should also be developed to include establishments adjacent to affected ones. Recommendations, provided for each of the scenarios assessed, aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to CCPP.

KW - Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia

KW - Disease control measures

KW - Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae

KW - monitoring period

KW - protection zone

KW - sampling procedures

KW - surveillance zone

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125314810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7068

DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7068

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35106092

SN - 1831-4732

VL - 20

JO - EFSA Journal

JF - EFSA Journal

IS - 1

M1 - e07068

ER -

Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Andre filer og links

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater