Aarhus Universitets segl

English

Du er her: AU » Om AU » Organisation » Assessment of open-source programs for automated tracking...

Om AU

Assessment of open-source programs for automated tracking of individual pigs within a group

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/proceeding › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › peer review

Standard

Assessment of open-source programs for automated tracking of individual pigs within a group. / Wurtz, Kaitlin Elizabeth; Norton, Tomas; Siegford, Janice et al.
Practical Precision Livestock Farming: Hands-on experiences with PLF technologies in commercial and R&D settings. red. / T. Banhazi; V. Halas; F. Maroto-Molina. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publicers, 2022. s. 213-230.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/proceeding › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › peer review

Harvard

Wurtz, KE, Norton, T, Siegford, J & Steibel, J 2022, Assessment of open-source programs for automated tracking of individual pigs within a group. i T Banhazi, V Halas & F Maroto-Molina (red), Practical Precision Livestock Farming: Hands-on experiences with PLF technologies in commercial and R&D settings. Wageningen Academic Publicers, Wageningen, s. 213-230. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-934-3_13

APA

Wurtz, K. E., Norton, T., Siegford, J., & Steibel, J. (2022). Assessment of open-source programs for automated tracking of individual pigs within a group. I T. Banhazi, V. Halas, & F. Maroto-Molina (red.), Practical Precision Livestock Farming: Hands-on experiences with PLF technologies in commercial and R&D settings (s. 213-230). Wageningen Academic Publicers. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-934-3_13

CBE

Wurtz KE, Norton T, Siegford J, Steibel J. 2022. Assessment of open-source programs for automated tracking of individual pigs within a group. Banhazi T, Halas V, Maroto-Molina F, red. I Practical Precision Livestock Farming: Hands-on experiences with PLF technologies in commercial and R&D settings. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publicers. s. 213-230. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-934-3_13

MLA

Wurtz, Kaitlin Elizabeth et al. "Assessment of open-source programs for automated tracking of individual pigs within a group"., Banhazi, T. Halas, V. Maroto-Molina, F. (red.). Practical Precision Livestock Farming: Hands-on experiences with PLF technologies in commercial and R&D settings. Kapitel 13, Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publicers. 2022, 213-230. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-934-3_13

Vancouver

Wurtz KE, Norton T, Siegford J, Steibel J. Assessment of open-source programs for automated tracking of individual pigs within a group. I Banhazi T, Halas V, Maroto-Molina F, red., Practical Precision Livestock Farming: Hands-on experiences with PLF technologies in commercial and R&D settings. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publicers. 2022. s. 213-230 doi: 10.3920/978-90-8686-934-3_13

Author

Wurtz, Kaitlin Elizabeth ; Norton, Tomas ; Siegford, Janice et al. / Assessment of open-source programs for automated tracking of individual pigs within a group. Practical Precision Livestock Farming: Hands-on experiences with PLF technologies in commercial and R&D settings. red. / T. Banhazi ; V. Halas ; F. Maroto-Molina. Wageningen : Wageningen Academic Publicers, 2022. s. 213-230

Bibtex

@inbook{385d5440bc3d42b1a712ff982f9aac35,
title = "Assessment of open-source programs for automated tracking of individual pigs within a group",
abstract = "As researchers search for tools to automate individual animal tracking, particularly in the livestock industry, they come across papers that make strong claims about the ability of such programs to accurately track individual animals within group-housed laboratory settings and imply that this ability will translate to other situations and species. We selected four of these programs (idTracker, ToxTrac, BioTracker, and Ctrax) and tested their ability to track single, pairs, and groups of pigs in an indoor pen typical of commercial farms and a pen modified to improve lighting, contrast, and camera location. We concluded that at present, these four tracking programs do not perform robustly enough to be adapted for use processing videos from commercial-style pig farms, including smaller research farms. It is hoped that identifying limitations of detection programs can help make systems more robust and user-friendly for future use.",
keywords = "precision livestock farming, behaviour, digital cameras, health, welfare",
author = "Wurtz, {Kaitlin Elizabeth} and Tomas Norton and Janice Siegford and Juan Steibel",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "9",
doi = "10.3920/978-90-8686-934-3_13",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-90-8686-382-2",
pages = "213--230",
editor = "T. Banhazi and V. Halas and F. Maroto-Molina",
booktitle = "Practical Precision Livestock Farming",
publisher = "Wageningen Academic Publicers",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Assessment of open-source programs for automated tracking of individual pigs within a group

AU - Wurtz, Kaitlin Elizabeth

AU - Norton, Tomas

AU - Siegford, Janice

AU - Steibel, Juan

PY - 2022/9/9

Y1 - 2022/9/9

N2 - As researchers search for tools to automate individual animal tracking, particularly in the livestock industry, they come across papers that make strong claims about the ability of such programs to accurately track individual animals within group-housed laboratory settings and imply that this ability will translate to other situations and species. We selected four of these programs (idTracker, ToxTrac, BioTracker, and Ctrax) and tested their ability to track single, pairs, and groups of pigs in an indoor pen typical of commercial farms and a pen modified to improve lighting, contrast, and camera location. We concluded that at present, these four tracking programs do not perform robustly enough to be adapted for use processing videos from commercial-style pig farms, including smaller research farms. It is hoped that identifying limitations of detection programs can help make systems more robust and user-friendly for future use.

AB - As researchers search for tools to automate individual animal tracking, particularly in the livestock industry, they come across papers that make strong claims about the ability of such programs to accurately track individual animals within group-housed laboratory settings and imply that this ability will translate to other situations and species. We selected four of these programs (idTracker, ToxTrac, BioTracker, and Ctrax) and tested their ability to track single, pairs, and groups of pigs in an indoor pen typical of commercial farms and a pen modified to improve lighting, contrast, and camera location. We concluded that at present, these four tracking programs do not perform robustly enough to be adapted for use processing videos from commercial-style pig farms, including smaller research farms. It is hoped that identifying limitations of detection programs can help make systems more robust and user-friendly for future use.

KW - precision livestock farming

KW - behaviour

KW - digital cameras

KW - health

KW - welfare

U2 - 10.3920/978-90-8686-934-3_13

DO - 10.3920/978-90-8686-934-3_13

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-90-8686-382-2

SP - 213

EP - 230

BT - Practical Precision Livestock Farming

A2 - Banhazi, T.

A2 - Halas, V.

A2 - Maroto-Molina, F.

PB - Wageningen Academic Publicers

CY - Wageningen

ER -