Are patient-reported outcomes useful in post-treatment follow-up care for women with early breast cancer? A scoping review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisReviewForskningpeer review

DOI

  • Cathrine Lundgaard Riis, Center for Shared Decision Making, Vejle, Denmark, Cathrine.lundgaard.riis@rsyd.dk.
  • ,
  • Troels Bechmann, Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, Cathrine.lundgaard.riis@rsyd.dk.
  • ,
  • Pernille Tine Jensen
  • Angela Coulter, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • ,
  • Karina Dahl Steffensen, Center for Shared Decision Making, Vejle, Denmark, Cathrine.lundgaard.riis@rsyd.dk.

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are frequently used to evaluate treatment effects and quality of life in clinical trials. The application of PROs in breast cancer clinics is evolving but their use to generate real-time information for use in follow-up care is uncommon. This proactive use might help to shift healthcare delivery toward a more patient-centered approach by acting as a screening tool for unmet needs or a dialogue tool to discuss issues proposed by the patient.

Aims: This review aims to determine the effects and feasibility of using PROs proactively during follow-up care in early breast cancer.

Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in January 2019 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL. Studies that exclusively concerned women treated for early breast cancer where PROs were used as a proactive tool during follow-up were included.

Results: The search revealed a total of 653 records and four eligible studies were identified; three of which concerned the use of PROs both as a screening tool and as a dialogue tool, and one study in which PROs were used solely as a screening tool. The studies explored the feasibility of collecting and integrating PROs in the clinic and their ability to detect otherwise unrecognized problems. All of the included studies were prone to bias, but they point to potential benefits in respect of better symptom management in follow-up care.

Conclusion: Our search identified a small number of low to moderate quality studies of the proactive use of PROs during follow-up after treatment for early stage breast cancer. The limited evidence available suggests that PROs may be useful for providing a more complete picture of the patient's symptoms and problems, possibly leading to improvements in symptom management.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPatient Related Outcome Measures
Vol/bind10
Sider (fra-til)117-127
Antal sider11
ISSN1179-271X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019
Eksternt udgivetJa

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 168157484