Archetypes of Open Science Partnerships: connecting aims and means in open biomedical research collaborations

Maria Theresa Norn; Laia Pujol Priego; Irene Ramos-Vielba; Thomas Kjeldager Ryan; Marie Louise Conradsen; Thomas Martin Durcan; David G. Hulcoop; Aled Edwards; Susanne Müller

doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03682-2

Archetypes of Open Science Partnerships: connecting aims and means in open biomedical research collaborations

Maria Theresa Norn^*, Laia Pujol Priego, Irene Ramos-Vielba, Thomas Kjeldager Ryan, Marie Louise Conradsen, Thomas Martin Durcan, David G. Hulcoop, Aled Edwards, Susanne Müller

^*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

Abstract

Open Science Partnerships (OSPs) are gaining attention as alternatives to university–industry collaborations with restrictive IPR and knowledge sharing policies. OSPs have different expected outcomes and deploy varying means to reach them. Appreciating these differences is crucial to understanding their scientific and socio-economic impact, and yet these differences have never been systematically investigated. This exploratory study draws on qualitative case studies of five biomedical OSPs involving academic partners and pharmaceutical companies. It identifies key elements—purpose, activities and structure—that can be used to describe how OSPs are designed. We identify two key aspects of purpose—predominant intent and research aims—which we argue affect the activities and structure of an OSP. Based on these two aspects, we propose four ideal types of OSPs that are designed to provide a starting point for researchers who explore the nature and impact of OSPs and for practitioners who are developing OSPs and wish to ensure that they deploy appropriate means to meet the intended outcomes of their partnership.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Artikelnummer	1184
Tidsskrift	Humanities and social sciences communications
Vol/bind	11
Nummer	1
ISSN	2662-9992
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03682-2
Status	Udgivet - dec. 2024

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1057/s41599-024-03682-2

Andre filer og links

Link to publication in Scopus

Citationsformater

@article{9b12712ee99949a489bbec984145642c,

title = "Archetypes of Open Science Partnerships: connecting aims and means in open biomedical research collaborations",

abstract = "Open Science Partnerships (OSPs) are gaining attention as alternatives to university–industry collaborations with restrictive IPR and knowledge sharing policies. OSPs have different expected outcomes and deploy varying means to reach them. Appreciating these differences is crucial to understanding their scientific and socio-economic impact, and yet these differences have never been systematically investigated. This exploratory study draws on qualitative case studies of five biomedical OSPs involving academic partners and pharmaceutical companies. It identifies key elements—purpose, activities and structure—that can be used to describe how OSPs are designed. We identify two key aspects of purpose—predominant intent and research aims—which we argue affect the activities and structure of an OSP. Based on these two aspects, we propose four ideal types of OSPs that are designed to provide a starting point for researchers who explore the nature and impact of OSPs and for practitioners who are developing OSPs and wish to ensure that they deploy appropriate means to meet the intended outcomes of their partnership.",

author = "Norn, {Maria Theresa} and Priego, {Laia Pujol} and Irene Ramos-Vielba and Ryan, {Thomas Kjeldager} and Conradsen, {Marie Louise} and Durcan, {Thomas Martin} and Hulcoop, {David G.} and Aled Edwards and Susanne M{\"u}ller",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2024.",

year = "2024",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1057/s41599-024-03682-2",

language = "English",

volume = "11",

journal = "Humanities and social sciences communications",

issn = "2662-9992",

publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

number = "1",

}

Archetypes of Open Science Partnerships: connecting aims and means in open biomedical research collaborations. / Norn, Maria Theresa; Priego, Laia Pujol; Ramos-Vielba, Irene et al.
I: Humanities and social sciences communications, Bind 11, Nr. 1, 1184, 12.2024.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Archetypes of Open Science Partnerships

T2 - connecting aims and means in open biomedical research collaborations

AU - Norn, Maria Theresa

AU - Priego, Laia Pujol

AU - Ramos-Vielba, Irene

AU - Ryan, Thomas Kjeldager

AU - Conradsen, Marie Louise

AU - Durcan, Thomas Martin

AU - Hulcoop, David G.

AU - Edwards, Aled

AU - Müller, Susanne

PY - 2024/12

Y1 - 2024/12

N2 - Open Science Partnerships (OSPs) are gaining attention as alternatives to university–industry collaborations with restrictive IPR and knowledge sharing policies. OSPs have different expected outcomes and deploy varying means to reach them. Appreciating these differences is crucial to understanding their scientific and socio-economic impact, and yet these differences have never been systematically investigated. This exploratory study draws on qualitative case studies of five biomedical OSPs involving academic partners and pharmaceutical companies. It identifies key elements—purpose, activities and structure—that can be used to describe how OSPs are designed. We identify two key aspects of purpose—predominant intent and research aims—which we argue affect the activities and structure of an OSP. Based on these two aspects, we propose four ideal types of OSPs that are designed to provide a starting point for researchers who explore the nature and impact of OSPs and for practitioners who are developing OSPs and wish to ensure that they deploy appropriate means to meet the intended outcomes of their partnership.

AB - Open Science Partnerships (OSPs) are gaining attention as alternatives to university–industry collaborations with restrictive IPR and knowledge sharing policies. OSPs have different expected outcomes and deploy varying means to reach them. Appreciating these differences is crucial to understanding their scientific and socio-economic impact, and yet these differences have never been systematically investigated. This exploratory study draws on qualitative case studies of five biomedical OSPs involving academic partners and pharmaceutical companies. It identifies key elements—purpose, activities and structure—that can be used to describe how OSPs are designed. We identify two key aspects of purpose—predominant intent and research aims—which we argue affect the activities and structure of an OSP. Based on these two aspects, we propose four ideal types of OSPs that are designed to provide a starting point for researchers who explore the nature and impact of OSPs and for practitioners who are developing OSPs and wish to ensure that they deploy appropriate means to meet the intended outcomes of their partnership.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203591685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/s41599-024-03682-2

DO - 10.1057/s41599-024-03682-2

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85203591685

SN - 2662-9992

VL - 11

JO - Humanities and social sciences communications

JF - Humanities and social sciences communications

IS - 1

M1 - 1184

ER -

Archetypes of Open Science Partnerships: connecting aims and means in open biomedical research collaborations

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Andre filer og links

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater