Abstract
According to relational egalitarianism, a society is just insofar as the relations in that society are equal. Exclusively, relational egalitarians have been concerned with why humans, in particular adults, must relate as equals. This is unfortunate since relational egalitarians claim to be in line with the concerns of real-life egalitarians; but real-life egalitarians, such as vegans and vegetarians, clearly care about injustices committed against non-human animals. In this article, I thus explore the role of non-human animals in relational egalitarianism. I distinguish four accounts of relational egalitarianism and argue that they differ in what they imply for relationships between humans and animals. Interestingly, it will also become clear that in relational egalitarianism, a relation may not only be unequal or equal; it may also be non-unequal.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Journal of Applied Philosophy |
| Vol/bind | 40 |
| Nummer | 1 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 79-94 |
| Antal sider | 16 |
| ISSN | 0264-3758 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - feb. 2023 |
| Udgivet eksternt | Ja |