Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis: FAVOR II China Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  • Bo Xu, Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • ,
  • Shengxian Tu, Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: sxtu@sjtu.edu.cn.
  • ,
  • Shubin Qiao, Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • ,
  • Xinkai Qu, Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.
  • ,
  • Yundai Chen, Department of Stomatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • ,
  • Junqing Yang, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
  • ,
  • Lijun Guo, Peking University
  • ,
  • Zhongwei Sun, Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • ,
  • Zehang Li, Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Med-X Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 1954, Hua Shan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
  • ,
  • Feng Tian, Department of Stomatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • ,
  • Weiyi Fang, Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.
  • ,
  • Jiyan Chen, Peking University
  • ,
  • Wei Li, Medical Research and Biometrics Center, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
  • ,
  • Changdong Guan, Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • ,
  • Niels R Holm
  • William Wijns, Cardiovascular Research Centre, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine and Curam, National University of Ireland, Galway, and Saolta University Healthcare Group, Galway, Ireland.
  • ,
  • Shengshou Hu, Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. Electronic address: shengshouhu@yahoo.com.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) for diagnosis of hemodynamically-significant coronary stenosis defined by fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.80.

BACKGROUND: QFR is a novel angiography-based method for deriving FFR without pressure wire or induction of hyperemia. The accuracy of QFR when assessed online in the catheterization laboratory has not been adequately examined to date.

METHODS: This prospective, multicenter trial enrolled patients who had at least one lesion with diameter stenosis of 30-90% and reference diameter ≥ 2mm by visual estimation. QFR, quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), and wire-based FFR were assessed online in blinded fashion during coronary angiography and re-analyzed offline at an independent core laboratory. The primary endpoint was that QFR would improve the diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography such that the lower boundary of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of this estimate exceeded 75%.

RESULTS: Between June and July 2017, 308 patients were consecutively enrolled at 5 centers. Online QFR and FFR results were both obtained in 328 of 332 interrogated vessels. Patient-level and vessel-level diagnostic accuracy of QFR were 92.4% (95% CI: 88.9%-95.1%) and 92.7% (95% CI: 89.3%-95.3%), that were both significantly higher than the prespecified target value (p <0.001). Sensitivity and specificity in identifying hemodynamically-significant stenosis were significantly higher for QFR than QCA (sensitivity: 94.6% versus 62.5%, difference: 32.0%, p <0.001; specificity: 91.7% versus 58.1%, difference: 36.1%, p <0.001). Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for QFR was 85.5%, 97.1%, 11.4, and 0.06, respectively. Offline analysis also showed vessel-level QFR had a high diagnostic accuracy of 93.3% (95% CI: 90.0%, 95.7%).

CONCLUSIONS: The study met its prespecified primary performance goal for the level of diagnostic accuracy of QFR in identifying hemodynamically-significant coronary stenosis.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Vol/bind70
Nummer25
Sider (fra-til)3077-3087
Antal sider11
ISSN0735-1097
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 26 dec. 2017

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 118413972