An objective framework to test the quality of candidate indicators of good environmental status

Ana M. Queirós; James A. Strong; Krysia Mazik; Jacob Carstensen; John Bruun; Paul J. Somerfield; Annette Bruhn; Stefano Ciavatta; Eva Flo; Nihayet Bizsel; Murat Özaydinli; Romualda Chuseve; Iñgo Muxika; Henrik Nygård; Nadia Papadopoulou; Maria Pantazi; Dorte Krause-Jensen

doi:10.3389/fmars.2016.00073

An objective framework to test the quality of candidate indicators of good environmental status

Ana M. Queirós, James A. Strong, Krysia Mazik, Jacob Carstensen, John Bruun, Paul J. Somerfield, Annette Bruhn, Stefano Ciavatta, Eva Flo, Nihayet Bizsel, Murat Özaydinli, Romualda Chuseve, Iñgo Muxika, Henrik Nygård, Nadia Papadopoulou, Maria Pantazi, Dorte Krause-Jensen

Institut for Ecoscience - Anvendt marin økologi og modellering

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

41 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Large efforts are on-going within the EU to prepare the Marine Strategy Framework Directive's (MSFD) assessment of the environmental status of the European seas. This assessment will only be as good as the indicators chosen to monitor the 11 descriptors of good environmental status (GEnS). An objective and transparent framework to determine whether chosen indicators actually support the aims of this policy is, however, not yet in place. Such frameworks are needed to ensure that the limited resources available to this assessment optimize the likelihood of achieving GEnS within collaborating states. Here, we developed a hypothesis-based protocol to evaluate whether candidate indicators meet quality criteria explicit to the MSFD, which the assessment community aspires to. Eight quality criteria are distilled from existing initiatives, and a testing and scoring protocol for each of them is presented. We exemplify its application in three worked examples, covering indicators for three GEnS descriptors (1, 5, and 6), various habitat components (seaweeds, seagrasses, benthic macrofauna, and plankton), and assessment regions (Danish, Lithuanian, and UK waters). We argue that this framework provides a necessary, transparent and standardized structure to support the comparison of candidate indicators, and the decision-making process leading to indicator selection. Its application could help identify potential limitations in currently available candidate metrics and, in such cases, help focus the development of more adequate indicators. Use of such standardized approaches will facilitate the sharing of knowledge gained across the MSFD parties despite context-specificity across assessment regions, and support the evidence-based management of European seas.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Artikelnummer	73
Tidsskrift	Frontiers in Marine Science
Vol/bind	3
Nummer	MAY
Antal sider	15
DOI	https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00073
Status	Udgivet - 2016

Adgang til dokumentet

10.3389/fmars.2016.00073

Andre filer og links

Link to publication in Scopus

Citationsformater

Queirós, A. M., Strong, J. A., Mazik, K., Carstensen, J., Bruun, J., Somerfield, P. J., Bruhn, A., Ciavatta, S., Flo, E., Bizsel, N., Özaydinli, M., Chuseve, R., Muxika, I., Nygård, H., Papadopoulou, N., Pantazi, M., & Krause-Jensen, D. (2016). An objective framework to test the quality of candidate indicators of good environmental status. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3(MAY), Artikel 73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00073

@article{84ccac47487d4cb09f168064eb990605,

title = "An objective framework to test the quality of candidate indicators of good environmental status",

abstract = "Large efforts are on-going within the EU to prepare the Marine Strategy Framework Directive's (MSFD) assessment of the environmental status of the European seas. This assessment will only be as good as the indicators chosen to monitor the 11 descriptors of good environmental status (GEnS). An objective and transparent framework to determine whether chosen indicators actually support the aims of this policy is, however, not yet in place. Such frameworks are needed to ensure that the limited resources available to this assessment optimize the likelihood of achieving GEnS within collaborating states. Here, we developed a hypothesis-based protocol to evaluate whether candidate indicators meet quality criteria explicit to the MSFD, which the assessment community aspires to. Eight quality criteria are distilled from existing initiatives, and a testing and scoring protocol for each of them is presented. We exemplify its application in three worked examples, covering indicators for three GEnS descriptors (1, 5, and 6), various habitat components (seaweeds, seagrasses, benthic macrofauna, and plankton), and assessment regions (Danish, Lithuanian, and UK waters). We argue that this framework provides a necessary, transparent and standardized structure to support the comparison of candidate indicators, and the decision-making process leading to indicator selection. Its application could help identify potential limitations in currently available candidate metrics and, in such cases, help focus the development of more adequate indicators. Use of such standardized approaches will facilitate the sharing of knowledge gained across the MSFD parties despite context-specificity across assessment regions, and support the evidence-based management of European seas.",

keywords = "European union, Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Water Frame Directive, ecosystems, good environmental status, indicator, pressure",

author = "Queir{\'o}s, {Ana M.} and Strong, {James A.} and Krysia Mazik and Jacob Carstensen and John Bruun and Somerfield, {Paul J.} and Annette Bruhn and Stefano Ciavatta and Eva Flo and Nihayet Bizsel and Murat {\"O}zaydinli and Romualda Chuseve and I{\~n}go Muxika and Henrik Nyg{\aa}rd and Nadia Papadopoulou and Maria Pantazi and Dorte Krause-Jensen",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.3389/fmars.2016.00073",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

journal = "Frontiers in Marine Science",

issn = "2296-7745",

publisher = "Frontiers Media SA",

number = "MAY",

}

Queirós, AM, Strong, JA, Mazik, K, Carstensen, J, Bruun, J, Somerfield, PJ, Bruhn, A, Ciavatta, S, Flo, E, Bizsel, N, Özaydinli, M, Chuseve, R, Muxika, I, Nygård, H, Papadopoulou, N, Pantazi, M & Krause-Jensen, D 2016, 'An objective framework to test the quality of candidate indicators of good environmental status', Frontiers in Marine Science, bind 3, nr. MAY, 73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00073

TY - JOUR

T1 - An objective framework to test the quality of candidate indicators of good environmental status

AU - Queirós, Ana M.

AU - Strong, James A.

AU - Mazik, Krysia

AU - Carstensen, Jacob

AU - Bruun, John

AU - Somerfield, Paul J.

AU - Bruhn, Annette

AU - Ciavatta, Stefano

AU - Flo, Eva

AU - Bizsel, Nihayet

AU - Özaydinli, Murat

AU - Chuseve, Romualda

AU - Muxika, Iñgo

AU - Nygård, Henrik

AU - Papadopoulou, Nadia

AU - Pantazi, Maria

AU - Krause-Jensen, Dorte

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Large efforts are on-going within the EU to prepare the Marine Strategy Framework Directive's (MSFD) assessment of the environmental status of the European seas. This assessment will only be as good as the indicators chosen to monitor the 11 descriptors of good environmental status (GEnS). An objective and transparent framework to determine whether chosen indicators actually support the aims of this policy is, however, not yet in place. Such frameworks are needed to ensure that the limited resources available to this assessment optimize the likelihood of achieving GEnS within collaborating states. Here, we developed a hypothesis-based protocol to evaluate whether candidate indicators meet quality criteria explicit to the MSFD, which the assessment community aspires to. Eight quality criteria are distilled from existing initiatives, and a testing and scoring protocol for each of them is presented. We exemplify its application in three worked examples, covering indicators for three GEnS descriptors (1, 5, and 6), various habitat components (seaweeds, seagrasses, benthic macrofauna, and plankton), and assessment regions (Danish, Lithuanian, and UK waters). We argue that this framework provides a necessary, transparent and standardized structure to support the comparison of candidate indicators, and the decision-making process leading to indicator selection. Its application could help identify potential limitations in currently available candidate metrics and, in such cases, help focus the development of more adequate indicators. Use of such standardized approaches will facilitate the sharing of knowledge gained across the MSFD parties despite context-specificity across assessment regions, and support the evidence-based management of European seas.

AB - Large efforts are on-going within the EU to prepare the Marine Strategy Framework Directive's (MSFD) assessment of the environmental status of the European seas. This assessment will only be as good as the indicators chosen to monitor the 11 descriptors of good environmental status (GEnS). An objective and transparent framework to determine whether chosen indicators actually support the aims of this policy is, however, not yet in place. Such frameworks are needed to ensure that the limited resources available to this assessment optimize the likelihood of achieving GEnS within collaborating states. Here, we developed a hypothesis-based protocol to evaluate whether candidate indicators meet quality criteria explicit to the MSFD, which the assessment community aspires to. Eight quality criteria are distilled from existing initiatives, and a testing and scoring protocol for each of them is presented. We exemplify its application in three worked examples, covering indicators for three GEnS descriptors (1, 5, and 6), various habitat components (seaweeds, seagrasses, benthic macrofauna, and plankton), and assessment regions (Danish, Lithuanian, and UK waters). We argue that this framework provides a necessary, transparent and standardized structure to support the comparison of candidate indicators, and the decision-making process leading to indicator selection. Its application could help identify potential limitations in currently available candidate metrics and, in such cases, help focus the development of more adequate indicators. Use of such standardized approaches will facilitate the sharing of knowledge gained across the MSFD parties despite context-specificity across assessment regions, and support the evidence-based management of European seas.

KW - European union

KW - Marine Strategy Framework Directive

KW - Water Frame Directive

KW - ecosystems

KW - good environmental status

KW - indicator

KW - pressure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008889477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fmars.2016.00073

DO - 10.3389/fmars.2016.00073

M3 - Journal article

SN - 2296-7745

VL - 3

JO - Frontiers in Marine Science

JF - Frontiers in Marine Science

IS - MAY

M1 - 73

ER -

An objective framework to test the quality of candidate indicators of good environmental status

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Andre filer og links

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater