Institut for Statskundskab

An Audit of Political Behavior Research

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  • Joshua Robison
  • ,
  • Randy T. Stevenson, Rice University, USA
  • James N. Druckman, Northwestern University, USA
  • Simon Jackman, University of Sydney
  • ,
  • Jonathan N. Katz, California Institute of Technology
  • ,
  • Lynn Vavreck, University of California Los Angeles
What are the most important concepts in the political behavior literature? Have experiments supplanted surveys as the dominant method in political behavior research? What role does the American National Election Studies (ANES) play in this literature? We utilize a content analysis of over 1,100 quantitative articles on American mass political behavior published between 1980 and 2009 to address these questions. We then supplement this with a second sample of articles published between 2010 and 2018. Four key takeaways are apparent. First, the agenda of this literature is heavily skewed toward understanding voting to a relative lack of attention to specific policy attitudes and other topics. Second, experiments are ascendant, but are far from displacing surveys, and particularly the ANES. Third, while important changes to this agenda have occurred over time, it remains much the same in 2018 as it was in 1980. Fourth, the centrality of the ANES seems to stem from its time-series component. In the end, we conclude that the ANES is a critical investment for the scientific community and a main driver of political behavior research.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftSage Open
Vol/bind8
Nummer3
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 130521377