A weak point analysis of welfare in Danish dairy herds using two different welfare assessment systems

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  • Nina Dam Otten, University of Copenhagen
  • ,
  • Tine Rousing
  • Victor Henrique Silva de Oliveira, National Veterinary Institute
  • ,
  • Mari Reiten
  • ,
  • A-M Michelsen, University of Copenhagen
  • ,
  • F. Hakansson, University of Copenhagen
  • ,
  • V. P. Lund, University of Copenhagen, Danish Veterinary Association
  • ,
  • Hans Houe, Københavns Universitet
  • ,
  • Matt Denwood, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Danmark
  • Jan Tind Sørensen
  • Bjørn Forkman, Københavns Universitet, Danmark
  • M. K. Kirchner, University of Copenhagen, VIER PFOTEN, Stiftung fűr Tierschutz
This study aimed to identify current weak points in animal welfare in Danish dairy production at herd level using the Welfare Quality® (WQ) protocol, and at national level using the Danish Animal Welfare Index (DAWIN) protocol. The DAWIN was developed as a monitoring tool for the welfare of the Danish dairy cow population, derived from the aggregation of DAWIN assessments at herd
level. The DAWIN dairy cow protocol covers 29 measures (13 resource- and 16 animal-based measures) that were weighted and aggregated into a final overall population welfare score. A total of 3,591 cows from 60 dairy herds were assessed throughout 2015. Results from both the WQ and DAWIN were presented at six criteria levels in order to identify specific areas of concern relating to animal welfare at herd versus population level. Both protocols indicated a good general level of welfare across study herds, but also identified insufficient water supply as the main area of concern. In addition, resting comfort (ie time needed to lie down, collisions with barn equipment, cleanliness of rear body parts, animals lying outside of the designated lying area) and disease (in terms of the proportion of cows with chronically elevated somatic cell counts) were identified as problematic areas. The two assessment protocols
both identified behavioural deficits, but in the WQ it was due to zero-grazing systems in contrast to the insufficient numbers of cow brushes in the DAWIN protocol. Despite differences in the aggregation, similar areas of concern were identified at criteria level.
TidsskriftAnimal Welfare
Sider (fra-til)197-207
Antal sider11
StatusUdgivet - 2020

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 185688594