Aarhus Universitets segl

A systematic literature review on meta sustainability labeling – What do we (not) know?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisReviewForskningpeer review

Standard

A systematic literature review on meta sustainability labeling – What do we (not) know? / Torma, Gabriele; Thøgersen, John.
I: Journal of Cleaner Production, Bind 293, 126194, 04.2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisReviewForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Torma G, Thøgersen J. A systematic literature review on meta sustainability labeling – What do we (not) know? Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021 apr.;293:126194. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126194

Author

Bibtex

@article{cc2d2ddae098444ca508393954ff4254,
title = "A systematic literature review on meta sustainability labeling – What do we (not) know?",
abstract = "Nudging consumers to make sustainable consumption decisions is what sustainability labeling is all about. However, the current sustainability labeling landscape is up against the challenge of too much, too complex, too similar, and too ambiguous information. Therefore, sustainability labeling schemes are looked upon as failing to support sustainability-involved consumers sufficiently. Meta sustainability labeling has been proposed as a means to reduce these challenges and strengthen the benefits of sustainability labeling. However, there is a need for systematically taking stock of and synthesizing what is known and what is yet unknown about meta sustainability labeling as input to decisions and development work regarding this instrument. This systematic literature review investigates how a meta sustainability label has been defined and assessed compared to existing, single-issue sustainability labels. First, four characteristic elements of a meta sustainability label are identified: multi-dimensionality, meta, multi-level, and universal. Second, a distinction between a meta sustainability label scheme and an integrated sustainability label scheme is proposed, the distinguishing characteristic being the (graphical) communication to the consumer. Third, benefits and disadvantages as well as facilitators of and impediments to implementing a meta sustainability scheme are identified. There is no consensus in the literature about the likelihood of a meta sustainability label doing a better job than existing sustainability labeling schemes. Perhaps the most important finding is that the debate regarding meta sustainability labeling is still in its infancy and lacks a proper evidence base. Thus, we encourage marketing and sustainability researchers to continue investigating meta sustainability labeling as a potentially useful tool for sustainability transformation.",
keywords = "Consumer behavior, Ecolabel, Literature review, Meta label, Product labeling, Sustainability",
author = "Gabriele Torma and John Th{\o}gersen",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126194",
language = "English",
volume = "293",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic literature review on meta sustainability labeling – What do we (not) know?

AU - Torma, Gabriele

AU - Thøgersen, John

PY - 2021/4

Y1 - 2021/4

N2 - Nudging consumers to make sustainable consumption decisions is what sustainability labeling is all about. However, the current sustainability labeling landscape is up against the challenge of too much, too complex, too similar, and too ambiguous information. Therefore, sustainability labeling schemes are looked upon as failing to support sustainability-involved consumers sufficiently. Meta sustainability labeling has been proposed as a means to reduce these challenges and strengthen the benefits of sustainability labeling. However, there is a need for systematically taking stock of and synthesizing what is known and what is yet unknown about meta sustainability labeling as input to decisions and development work regarding this instrument. This systematic literature review investigates how a meta sustainability label has been defined and assessed compared to existing, single-issue sustainability labels. First, four characteristic elements of a meta sustainability label are identified: multi-dimensionality, meta, multi-level, and universal. Second, a distinction between a meta sustainability label scheme and an integrated sustainability label scheme is proposed, the distinguishing characteristic being the (graphical) communication to the consumer. Third, benefits and disadvantages as well as facilitators of and impediments to implementing a meta sustainability scheme are identified. There is no consensus in the literature about the likelihood of a meta sustainability label doing a better job than existing sustainability labeling schemes. Perhaps the most important finding is that the debate regarding meta sustainability labeling is still in its infancy and lacks a proper evidence base. Thus, we encourage marketing and sustainability researchers to continue investigating meta sustainability labeling as a potentially useful tool for sustainability transformation.

AB - Nudging consumers to make sustainable consumption decisions is what sustainability labeling is all about. However, the current sustainability labeling landscape is up against the challenge of too much, too complex, too similar, and too ambiguous information. Therefore, sustainability labeling schemes are looked upon as failing to support sustainability-involved consumers sufficiently. Meta sustainability labeling has been proposed as a means to reduce these challenges and strengthen the benefits of sustainability labeling. However, there is a need for systematically taking stock of and synthesizing what is known and what is yet unknown about meta sustainability labeling as input to decisions and development work regarding this instrument. This systematic literature review investigates how a meta sustainability label has been defined and assessed compared to existing, single-issue sustainability labels. First, four characteristic elements of a meta sustainability label are identified: multi-dimensionality, meta, multi-level, and universal. Second, a distinction between a meta sustainability label scheme and an integrated sustainability label scheme is proposed, the distinguishing characteristic being the (graphical) communication to the consumer. Third, benefits and disadvantages as well as facilitators of and impediments to implementing a meta sustainability scheme are identified. There is no consensus in the literature about the likelihood of a meta sustainability label doing a better job than existing sustainability labeling schemes. Perhaps the most important finding is that the debate regarding meta sustainability labeling is still in its infancy and lacks a proper evidence base. Thus, we encourage marketing and sustainability researchers to continue investigating meta sustainability labeling as a potentially useful tool for sustainability transformation.

KW - Consumer behavior

KW - Ecolabel

KW - Literature review

KW - Meta label

KW - Product labeling

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100647517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126194

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126194

M3 - Review

VL - 293

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

M1 - 126194

ER -