Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
Forlagets udgivne version
BACKGROUND: Clinical tests that can discriminate between people at risk of falling and those not at risk are warranted. The discriminative properties of the Six-Spot Step Test was investigated in people with Parkinson's disease at risk of falling. METHODS: Eighty-one participants with a median age of 69 years (Q1-Q3:63-74) and a median Hoehn and Yahr score of 2.5 (Q1-Q3:2-3) completed the Six-Spot Step Test and the Timed 'Up and Go' test. A mini-BESTest score of 19 or below was used as a cut-off for defining risk of falling, and a receiver operating characteristics curve was generated to determine clinical relevant cut-off scores. RESULTS: A cut-off score of 7.0 and 6.8 seconds identified people not at risk of falling, while 11.1 and 9.4 seconds identified people at risk of falling for the Six-Spot Step Test and the Timed 'Up and Go' test, respectively. When maximizing the sensitivity and specificity a cut-off score of 9.2 (accuracy of 84%) and 8.1 seconds (accuracy of 70%) was found for the Six-Spot Step Test and the Timed 'Up and Go' test, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Six-Spot Step Test discriminates accurately between people with Parkinson's disease at risk of falling and people not at risk.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | NeuroRehabilitation |
Vol/bind | 45 |
Nummer | 2 |
Sider (fra-til) | 265-272 |
Antal sider | 8 |
ISSN | 1053-8135 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - nov. 2019 |
Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater
ID: 173299755