A note on the direct democracy deficit in two-tier voting

Nicola Maaser, Stefan Napel*

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

8 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

A large population of voters with single-peaked preferences are partitioned into disjoint constituencies. Collective decisions are taken by their representatives, one from each constituency, according to a weighted voting rule. It is assumed that each representative's ideal point perfectly matches that of the respective constituency median and that top-tier decisions are in the voting game's core. The resulting representative-democratic voting outcomes generally differ from those of a direct-democratic, single-tier system. The expected discrepancy varies with the voting weight allocation. It is minimized by weights proportional to constituency population sizes only if citizens differ sufficiently more between than within constituencies. Weights proportional to the square root of population sizes perform better if all citizens have independent and identically distributed ideal points.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftMathematical Social Sciences
Vol/bind63
Nummer2
Sider (fra-til)174-180
Antal sider7
ISSN0165-4896
DOI
StatusUdgivet - mar. 2012

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'A note on the direct democracy deficit in two-tier voting'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater