Abstract
J. D. Trout has recently developed a new defense of scientific realism, a new version of the No Miracles Argument. I critically evaluate Trout's novel defense of realism. I argue that Trout's argument for scientific realism and the related explanation for the success of science are self-defeating. In the process of arguing against the traditional realist strategies for explaining the success of science, he inadvertently undermines his own argument.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A |
Vol/bind | 69 |
Sider (fra-til) | 86-89 |
Antal sider | 4 |
ISSN | 0039-3681 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - jun. 2018 |