A critical comparison of concepts and approaches to social sustainability in the construction industry

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

6 Citationer (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Sustainability is a major driving force in today's society as it serves as a guiding principle in decision-making towards a better and sustainable future. In practice, the concept of sustainability has been concretised through the development of the three pillars of sustainability: social, environmental, and economic. It is commonly acknowledged that the social pillar is the least developed and that the pillar needs more streamlined and applicable definitions, frameworks and approaches. Within the building and construction industry, the sustainability of buildings is typically assessed based on building certification systems. The aim of this article is to compare the definitions and approaches to social sustainability in the existing academic literature and prevailing social sustainability-focused building certification systems (i.e., BREEAM, LEED, DGNB, and WELL). This is done through a systematic review of the academic literature using the PRISMA (The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-framework and an in-depth investigation of the assessment criteria in the building certification systems, focusing on the values assessed rather than benchmark values and assessment methods. The paper concludes that while there is no commonly agreed-upon definition or approach to social sustainability, there is a consensus in parts of the academic literature that social sustainability has an overarching perspective that is comparable to an absolute concept. This absolute approach is not present in the certification systems, so they neither ensure nor improve overarching social sustainability. Instead, they are designed to improve selected social values and contribute to social sustainability by focusing on specific and concretised social values.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer109530
TidsskriftJournal of Building Engineering
Vol/bind91
Antal sider68
ISSN2352-7102
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 15 aug. 2024

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'A critical comparison of concepts and approaches to social sustainability in the construction industry'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater