A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

Standard

A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice. / Akerlof, Karen; Tyler, Chris; Foxen, Sarah Elizabeth et al.

I: Humanities and social sciences communications, Bind 5, Nr. 1, 108, 2019.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

Harvard

Akerlof, K, Tyler, C, Foxen, SE, Heath, E, Gual Soler, M, Allegra, A, Cloyd, ET, Hird, JA, Nelson, SM, Nguyen, CT, Gonnella, CJ, Berigan, LA, Abeledo, CR, Al-Yakoub, TA, Andoh, HF, dos Santos Boeira, L, van Boheemen, P, Cairney, P, Cook-Deegan, R, Costigan, G, Dhimal, M, Di Marco, MH, Dube, D, Egbetokun, A, El Kharraz, J, Galindo, LE, Ferguson, MWJ, Franco, J, Graves, Z, Hayter, E, Hernández-Mondragón, AC, Hobbs, AD, Holden, KL, IJsselmuiden, C, Jegede, AS, Krstic, SB, Mbonyintwali, J-M, Mengesha, SD, Michalek, T, Nagano, H, Nentwich, M, Nouri, A, Ntale, PD, Ogundele, OM, Omenma, JT, Pau, L-F, Peha, JM, Prescott, EM, Ramos-Vielba, I & Roberts, R 2019, 'A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice', Humanities and social sciences communications, bind 5, nr. 1, 108. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6

APA

Akerlof, K., Tyler, C., Foxen, S. E., Heath, E., Gual Soler, M., Allegra, A., Cloyd, E. T., Hird, J. A., Nelson, S. M., Nguyen, C. T., Gonnella, C. J., Berigan, L. A., Abeledo, C. R., Al-Yakoub, T. A., Andoh, H. F., dos Santos Boeira, L., van Boheemen, P., Cairney, P., Cook-Deegan, R., ... Roberts, R. (2019). A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice. Humanities and social sciences communications, 5(1), [108]. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6

CBE

Akerlof K, Tyler C, Foxen SE, Heath E, Gual Soler M, Allegra A, Cloyd ET, Hird JA, Nelson SM, Nguyen CT, et al. 2019. A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice. Humanities and social sciences communications. 5(1):Article 108. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6

MLA

Akerlof, Karen et al. "A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice". Humanities and social sciences communications. 2019. 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6

Vancouver

Akerlof K, Tyler C, Foxen SE, Heath E, Gual Soler M, Allegra A et al. A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice. Humanities and social sciences communications. 2019;5(1). 108. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6

Author

Akerlof, Karen ; Tyler, Chris ; Foxen, Sarah Elizabeth et al. / A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice. I: Humanities and social sciences communications. 2019 ; Bind 5, Nr. 1.

Bibtex

@article{ca0542305f7d4f14ac282a823be30add,

title = "A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice",

abstract = "The quantity and complexity of scientific and technological information provided to policymakers have been on the rise for decades. Yet little is known about how to provide science advice to legislatures, even though scientific information is widely acknowledged as valuable for decision-making in many policy domains. We asked academics, science advisers, and policymakers from both developed and developing nations to identify, review and refine, and then rank the most pressing research questions on legislative science advice (LSA). Experts generally agree that the state of evidence is poor, especially regarding developing and lower-middle income countries. Many fundamental questions about science advice processes remain unanswered and are of great interest: whether legislative use of scientific evidence improves the implementation and outcome of social programs and policies; under what conditions legislators and staff seek out scientific information or use what is presented to them; and how different communication channels affect informational trust and use. Environment and health are the highest priority policy domains for the field. The context-specific nature of many of the submitted questions—whether to policy issues, institutions, or locations—suggests one of the significant challenges is aggregating generalizable evidence on LSA practices. Understanding these research needs represents a first step in advancing a global agenda for LSA research.",

author = "Karen Akerlof and Chris Tyler and Foxen, {Sarah Elizabeth} and Erin Heath and {Gual Soler}, Marga and Alessandro Allegra and Cloyd, {Emily T.} and Hird, {John A.} and Nelson, {Selena M.} and Nguyen, {Christina T.} and Gonnella, {Cameryn J.} and Berigan, {Liam A.} and Abeledo, {Carlos R.} and Al-Yakoub, {Tamara Adel} and Andoh, {Harris Francis} and {dos Santos Boeira}, Laura and {van Boheemen}, Pieter and Paul Cairney and Robert Cook-Deegan and Gavin Costigan and Meghnath Dhimal and {Di Marco}, {Mart{\'i}n Hern{\'a}n} and Donatus Dube and Abiodun Egbetokun and {El Kharraz}, Jauad and Galindo, {Liliana Estrada} and Ferguson, {Mark W. J.} and Jos{\'e} Franco and Zach Graves and Emily Hayter and Hern{\'a}ndez-Mondrag{\'o}n, {Alma Cristal} and Hobbs, {Abbi D.} and Holden, {Kerry L.} and Carel IJsselmuiden and Jegede, {Ayodele Samuel} and Krstic, {Snezana B.} and Jean-Marie Mbonyintwali and Mengesha, {Sisay Derso} and Tomas Michalek and Hiroshi Nagano and Michael Nentwich and Ali Nouri and Ntale, {Peter Dithan} and Ogundele, {Olusegun M.} and Omenma, {Jude Tochukwu} and Louis-Fran{\c c}ois Pau and Peha, {Jon M.} and Prescott, {Elizabeth M.} and Irene Ramos-Vielba and Raimundo Roberts",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6",

language = "English",

volume = "5",

journal = "Humanities & Social Sciences Communications",

issn = "2662-9992",

publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice

AU - Akerlof, Karen

AU - Tyler, Chris

AU - Foxen, Sarah Elizabeth

AU - Heath, Erin

AU - Gual Soler, Marga

AU - Allegra, Alessandro

AU - Cloyd, Emily T.

AU - Hird, John A.

AU - Nelson, Selena M.

AU - Nguyen, Christina T.

AU - Gonnella, Cameryn J.

AU - Berigan, Liam A.

AU - Abeledo, Carlos R.

AU - Al-Yakoub, Tamara Adel

AU - Andoh, Harris Francis

AU - dos Santos Boeira, Laura

AU - van Boheemen, Pieter

AU - Cairney, Paul

AU - Cook-Deegan, Robert

AU - Costigan, Gavin

AU - Dhimal, Meghnath

AU - Di Marco, Martín Hernán

AU - Dube, Donatus

AU - Egbetokun, Abiodun

AU - El Kharraz, Jauad

AU - Galindo, Liliana Estrada

AU - Ferguson, Mark W. J.

AU - Franco, José

AU - Graves, Zach

AU - Hayter, Emily

AU - Hernández-Mondragón, Alma Cristal

AU - Hobbs, Abbi D.

AU - Holden, Kerry L.

AU - IJsselmuiden, Carel

AU - Jegede, Ayodele Samuel

AU - Krstic, Snezana B.

AU - Mbonyintwali, Jean-Marie

AU - Mengesha, Sisay Derso

AU - Michalek, Tomas

AU - Nagano, Hiroshi

AU - Nentwich, Michael

AU - Nouri, Ali

AU - Ntale, Peter Dithan

AU - Ogundele, Olusegun M.

AU - Omenma, Jude Tochukwu

AU - Pau, Louis-François

AU - Peha, Jon M.

AU - Prescott, Elizabeth M.

AU - Ramos-Vielba, Irene

AU - Roberts, Raimundo

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The quantity and complexity of scientific and technological information provided to policymakers have been on the rise for decades. Yet little is known about how to provide science advice to legislatures, even though scientific information is widely acknowledged as valuable for decision-making in many policy domains. We asked academics, science advisers, and policymakers from both developed and developing nations to identify, review and refine, and then rank the most pressing research questions on legislative science advice (LSA). Experts generally agree that the state of evidence is poor, especially regarding developing and lower-middle income countries. Many fundamental questions about science advice processes remain unanswered and are of great interest: whether legislative use of scientific evidence improves the implementation and outcome of social programs and policies; under what conditions legislators and staff seek out scientific information or use what is presented to them; and how different communication channels affect informational trust and use. Environment and health are the highest priority policy domains for the field. The context-specific nature of many of the submitted questions—whether to policy issues, institutions, or locations—suggests one of the significant challenges is aggregating generalizable evidence on LSA practices. Understanding these research needs represents a first step in advancing a global agenda for LSA research.

AB - The quantity and complexity of scientific and technological information provided to policymakers have been on the rise for decades. Yet little is known about how to provide science advice to legislatures, even though scientific information is widely acknowledged as valuable for decision-making in many policy domains. We asked academics, science advisers, and policymakers from both developed and developing nations to identify, review and refine, and then rank the most pressing research questions on legislative science advice (LSA). Experts generally agree that the state of evidence is poor, especially regarding developing and lower-middle income countries. Many fundamental questions about science advice processes remain unanswered and are of great interest: whether legislative use of scientific evidence improves the implementation and outcome of social programs and policies; under what conditions legislators and staff seek out scientific information or use what is presented to them; and how different communication channels affect informational trust and use. Environment and health are the highest priority policy domains for the field. The context-specific nature of many of the submitted questions—whether to policy issues, institutions, or locations—suggests one of the significant challenges is aggregating generalizable evidence on LSA practices. Understanding these research needs represents a first step in advancing a global agenda for LSA research.

U2 - 10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6

DO - 10.1057/s41599-019-0318-6

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

JO - Humanities & Social Sciences Communications

JF - Humanities & Social Sciences Communications

SN - 2662-9992

IS - 1

M1 - 108

ER -

Institut for Statskundskab