TY - JOUR
T1 - β-Trace Protein and β2-Microglobulin do not Improve Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Kidney Transplant Recipients Compared With Creatinine and Cystatin C
AU - Kure, Nathalie
AU - Krogstrup, Nicoline Valentina
AU - Oltean, Mihai
AU - Jespersen, Bente
AU - Birn, Henrik
AU - Bodilsen Nielsen, Marie
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - Background: Reliable estimates of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are important for detecting changes in graft function in kidney transplant recipients. Current eGFR equations are based on plasma creatinine and/or cystatin C; however, these are associated with significant bias. This study investigated if equations based on β-trace protein (BTP) and β2-microglobulin (B2M) performed better than the 2021 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations based on creatinine and cystatin C among kidney transplant recipients. Methods: We included samples and data from the clinical trial CONTEXT. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured by plasma clearance of an exogenous marker. The eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI equations for estimating GFR from BTP and/or B2M and the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine and creatinine-cystatin C equations. The GFR estimates were evaluated 3 (n = 82) and 12 (n = 64) months after transplant using mean bias, precision, and accuracy. Furthermore, we analyzed the ability of the equations to correctly classify the direction of changes in measured GFR from 3 to 12 months. Results: Among the BTP- and B2M-based equations, the combined eGFR-BTP-B2M performed best with respect to precision (SD = 7.64 mL/min/1.73 m
2) and accuracy (±10% from measured GFR = 36%). The eGFR-BTP-B2M and the eGFR-creatinine-cystatin C (2021) performed similarly when comparing precision, accuracy, and residuals (P =.481). The BTP- and/or B2M-based equations did not perform better than the eGFR-creatinine-cystatin C (2021) in correctly classifying the direction of changes in measured GFR from 3 to 12 months. Conclusions: β-trace protein and/or B2M do not improve the estimation of GFR when compared with creatinine- and cystatin C-based 2021 CKD-EPI equations.
AB - Background: Reliable estimates of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are important for detecting changes in graft function in kidney transplant recipients. Current eGFR equations are based on plasma creatinine and/or cystatin C; however, these are associated with significant bias. This study investigated if equations based on β-trace protein (BTP) and β2-microglobulin (B2M) performed better than the 2021 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations based on creatinine and cystatin C among kidney transplant recipients. Methods: We included samples and data from the clinical trial CONTEXT. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured by plasma clearance of an exogenous marker. The eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI equations for estimating GFR from BTP and/or B2M and the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine and creatinine-cystatin C equations. The GFR estimates were evaluated 3 (n = 82) and 12 (n = 64) months after transplant using mean bias, precision, and accuracy. Furthermore, we analyzed the ability of the equations to correctly classify the direction of changes in measured GFR from 3 to 12 months. Results: Among the BTP- and B2M-based equations, the combined eGFR-BTP-B2M performed best with respect to precision (SD = 7.64 mL/min/1.73 m
2) and accuracy (±10% from measured GFR = 36%). The eGFR-BTP-B2M and the eGFR-creatinine-cystatin C (2021) performed similarly when comparing precision, accuracy, and residuals (P =.481). The BTP- and/or B2M-based equations did not perform better than the eGFR-creatinine-cystatin C (2021) in correctly classifying the direction of changes in measured GFR from 3 to 12 months. Conclusions: β-trace protein and/or B2M do not improve the estimation of GFR when compared with creatinine- and cystatin C-based 2021 CKD-EPI equations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173736481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.08.025
DO - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.08.025
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37806869
SN - 0041-1345
VL - 55
SP - 2071
EP - 2078
JO - Transplantation Proceedings
JF - Transplantation Proceedings
IS - 9
ER -