Sisse Helle Njor

Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program. / Lund, Martin; Erichsen, Rune; Valori, Roland; Møller Jensen, Thomas; Helle Njor, Sisse; Laurberg, Søren; Andersen, Berit; on behalf of the Central Denmark Region's "Quality of Colonoscopies" group†.

I: Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, Bind 54, Nr. 4, 2019, s. 471-477.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

Lund, M, Erichsen, R, Valori, R, Møller Jensen, T, Helle Njor, S, Laurberg, S, Andersen, B & on behalf of the Central Denmark Region's "Quality of Colonoscopies" group† 2019, 'Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program', Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, bind 54, nr. 4, s. 471-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2019.1597158

APA

Lund, M., Erichsen, R., Valori, R., Møller Jensen, T., Helle Njor, S., Laurberg, S., Andersen, B., & on behalf of the Central Denmark Region's "Quality of Colonoscopies" group† (2019). Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 54(4), 471-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2019.1597158

CBE

Lund M, Erichsen R, Valori R, Møller Jensen T, Helle Njor S, Laurberg S, Andersen B, on behalf of the Central Denmark Region's "Quality of Colonoscopies" group†. 2019. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 54(4):471-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2019.1597158

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Lund, Martin ; Erichsen, Rune ; Valori, Roland ; Møller Jensen, Thomas ; Helle Njor, Sisse ; Laurberg, Søren ; Andersen, Berit ; on behalf of the Central Denmark Region's "Quality of Colonoscopies" group†. / Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program. I: Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2019 ; Bind 54, Nr. 4. s. 471-477.

Bibtex

@article{f591041fc3f24c56a2454047021190b3,
title = "Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: From the prevalent round of the Danish FIT-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program, we aimed (i) to evaluate the quality of recorded data and (ii) to characterize the colonoscopies by measuring variation in performance indicators between colonoscopists and assessing the ratio between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and polyp detection rate (PDR).MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included screening colonoscopies performed in Central Denmark Region within 60 days of a positive FIT-result from 1 July 2015 through 30 June 2017. The participants were the colonoscopists, performing these procedures. The quality indicators cecal intubation rate (CIR), PDR, polyp retrieval rate (PRR), ADR and withdrawal time (WT) were evaluated. ADR/PDR ratios were calculated.RESULTS: The concordance between the recorded data and the colonoscopy reports showed Kappa values in the range of 0.47-0.97. The overall CIR was 90.6% (range 73.7%-100%), PDR: 51.9% (range 18.4%-70.2%), PRR: 94.6% (range 69.6%-100%), ADR (conventional adenomas): 50.6% (range 18.4%-70.2%), ADRx (conventional adenomas, traditional serrated adenomas and sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia): 50.9% (range 18.4%-70.2%) and the mean WT was 11.3 min (range 4.5-24.9 min). The ADR/PDR ratio was 92.8% (95% CI: 92.0%-93.6%) and the ADRx/PDR ratio was 93.2% (95% CI: 92.4%-93.9%).CONCLUSION: Data quality was generally high. We found considerable variation in performance indicators between colonoscopists reflecting the potential for improvement. Further, our findings revealed that the PDR might be a good proxy for ADR in the context of the prevalent round of FIT-based CRC screening programs.",
keywords = "ADENOMA DETECTION RATE, Colorectal cancer, RISK, TIME, adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, fecal immunochemical test, performance indicators, polyp detection rate, polyp recovery, polyp retrieval rate, quality indicators, screening, withdrawal time",
author = "Martin Lund and Rune Erichsen and Roland Valori and {M{\o}ller Jensen}, Thomas and {Helle Njor}, Sisse and S{\o}ren Laurberg and Berit Andersen and {on behalf of the Central Denmark Region's {"}Quality of Colonoscopies{"} group†}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/00365521.2019.1597158",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "471--477",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0036-5521",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis ",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program

AU - Lund, Martin

AU - Erichsen, Rune

AU - Valori, Roland

AU - Møller Jensen, Thomas

AU - Helle Njor, Sisse

AU - Laurberg, Søren

AU - Andersen, Berit

AU - on behalf of the Central Denmark Region's "Quality of Colonoscopies" group†

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - OBJECTIVE: From the prevalent round of the Danish FIT-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program, we aimed (i) to evaluate the quality of recorded data and (ii) to characterize the colonoscopies by measuring variation in performance indicators between colonoscopists and assessing the ratio between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and polyp detection rate (PDR).MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included screening colonoscopies performed in Central Denmark Region within 60 days of a positive FIT-result from 1 July 2015 through 30 June 2017. The participants were the colonoscopists, performing these procedures. The quality indicators cecal intubation rate (CIR), PDR, polyp retrieval rate (PRR), ADR and withdrawal time (WT) were evaluated. ADR/PDR ratios were calculated.RESULTS: The concordance between the recorded data and the colonoscopy reports showed Kappa values in the range of 0.47-0.97. The overall CIR was 90.6% (range 73.7%-100%), PDR: 51.9% (range 18.4%-70.2%), PRR: 94.6% (range 69.6%-100%), ADR (conventional adenomas): 50.6% (range 18.4%-70.2%), ADRx (conventional adenomas, traditional serrated adenomas and sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia): 50.9% (range 18.4%-70.2%) and the mean WT was 11.3 min (range 4.5-24.9 min). The ADR/PDR ratio was 92.8% (95% CI: 92.0%-93.6%) and the ADRx/PDR ratio was 93.2% (95% CI: 92.4%-93.9%).CONCLUSION: Data quality was generally high. We found considerable variation in performance indicators between colonoscopists reflecting the potential for improvement. Further, our findings revealed that the PDR might be a good proxy for ADR in the context of the prevalent round of FIT-based CRC screening programs.

AB - OBJECTIVE: From the prevalent round of the Danish FIT-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program, we aimed (i) to evaluate the quality of recorded data and (ii) to characterize the colonoscopies by measuring variation in performance indicators between colonoscopists and assessing the ratio between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and polyp detection rate (PDR).MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included screening colonoscopies performed in Central Denmark Region within 60 days of a positive FIT-result from 1 July 2015 through 30 June 2017. The participants were the colonoscopists, performing these procedures. The quality indicators cecal intubation rate (CIR), PDR, polyp retrieval rate (PRR), ADR and withdrawal time (WT) were evaluated. ADR/PDR ratios were calculated.RESULTS: The concordance between the recorded data and the colonoscopy reports showed Kappa values in the range of 0.47-0.97. The overall CIR was 90.6% (range 73.7%-100%), PDR: 51.9% (range 18.4%-70.2%), PRR: 94.6% (range 69.6%-100%), ADR (conventional adenomas): 50.6% (range 18.4%-70.2%), ADRx (conventional adenomas, traditional serrated adenomas and sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia): 50.9% (range 18.4%-70.2%) and the mean WT was 11.3 min (range 4.5-24.9 min). The ADR/PDR ratio was 92.8% (95% CI: 92.0%-93.6%) and the ADRx/PDR ratio was 93.2% (95% CI: 92.4%-93.9%).CONCLUSION: Data quality was generally high. We found considerable variation in performance indicators between colonoscopists reflecting the potential for improvement. Further, our findings revealed that the PDR might be a good proxy for ADR in the context of the prevalent round of FIT-based CRC screening programs.

KW - ADENOMA DETECTION RATE

KW - Colorectal cancer

KW - RISK

KW - TIME

KW - adenoma detection rate

KW - cecal intubation rate

KW - fecal immunochemical test

KW - performance indicators

KW - polyp detection rate

KW - polyp recovery

KW - polyp retrieval rate

KW - quality indicators

KW - screening

KW - withdrawal time

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064513048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00365521.2019.1597158

DO - 10.1080/00365521.2019.1597158

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30978128

VL - 54

SP - 471

EP - 477

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0036-5521

IS - 4

ER -