Simple F. Kothari

The relationship between headache-attributed disability and lost productivity: 2. Empirical evidence from population-based studies in nine disparate countries

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  • Hallie Thomas, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • ,
  • Simple Futarmal Kothari
  • Andreas Husøy, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • ,
  • Rigmor Højland Jensen, Københavns Universitet
  • ,
  • Zaza Katsarava, Evangelical Hospital Unna, University of Duisburg-Essen, EVEX Medical Corporation, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
  • ,
  • Michela Tinelli, The London School of Economics and Political Science
  • ,
  • Timothy J. Steiner, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Imperial College London

Background: Headache disorders are disabling, with major consequences for productivity, yet the literature is silent on the relationship between headache-attributed disability and lost productivity, often erroneously regarding the two as synonymous. We evaluated the relationship empirically, having earlier found that investment in structured headache services would be cost saving, not merely cost-effective, if reductions in headache-attributed disability led to > 20% pro rata recovery of lost productivity. Methods: We used individual participant data from Global Campaign population-based studies conducted in China, Ethiopia, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Russia, and from Eurolight in Lithuania, Luxembourg and Spain. We assessed relationships in migraine and probable medication-overuse headache (pMOH), the most disabling common headache disorders. Available symptom data included headache frequency, usual duration and usual intensity. We used frequency and duration to estimate proportion of time in ictal state (pTIS). Disability, in the sense used by the Global Burden of Disease study, was measured as the product of pTIS and disability weight for the ictal state. Impairment was measured as pTIS * intensity. Lost productivity was measured as lost days (absence or < 50% productivity) from paid work and corresponding losses from household work over the preceding 3 months. We used Spearman correlation and linear regression analyses. Results: For migraine, in a linear model, we found positive associations with lost paid worktime, significant (p < 0.05) in many countries and highly significant (p < 0.001) in some despite low values of R2 (0–0.16) due to high variance. With lost household worktime and total lost productivity (paid + household), associations were highly significant in almost all countries, although still with low R2 (0.04–0.22). Applying the regression equations for each country to the population mean migraine-attributed disability, we found pro rata recoveries of lost productivity in the range 16–56% (> 20% in all countries but Pakistan). Analysing impairment rather than disability increased variability. For pMOH, with smaller numbers, associations were generally weaker, occasionally negative and mostly not significant. Conclusion: Relief of disability through effective treatment of migraine is expected, in most countries, to recover > 20% pro rata of lost productivity, above the threshold for investment in structured headache services to be cost saving.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer153
TidsskriftJournal of Headache and Pain
Vol/bind22
ISSN1129-2369
DOI
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2021

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 228661440