Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Sara Dybris McQuaid

'Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed': The problem of disaggregation, diplomatic intervention and dealing with the past in Northern Ireland

Publikation: KonferencebidragKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskningpeer review

In terms of conflict resolution, we may think of Northern Ireland as a case of (deferring conflict by) institutionalising radical disagreement, in particular through the Agreement from 1998. The violence has largely if not completely stopped, but the key constitutional question of whether Northern Ireland should be British or Irish, is only settled for now. In the language of dialogue, the parties have “agreed to disagree” with an understanding that these matters can be reopened at some future date if there is a majority wish to do so. In the meantime, a system of designated power-sharing has been established, which responds to but also perpetuates the disagreements between unionists and nationalists and their accompanying discourses. This makes NI a useful prism for thinking about sequencing in conflict resolution structuring the kinds of political dialogues that are possible.
OriginalsprogDansk
Udgivelsesår20 jan. 2015
Antal sider13
StatusUdgivet - 20 jan. 2015
BegivenhedRethinking Dialogue in Conflict Resolution - Copenhagen University/CRIC, Copenhagen, Danmark
Varighed: 20 jan. 201520 jan. 2015

Konference

KonferenceRethinking Dialogue in Conflict Resolution
LokationCopenhagen University/CRIC
LandDanmark
ByCopenhagen
Periode20/01/201520/01/2015

    Forskningsområder

  • Negotiation, Dialogue, Dealing with the past, Northern Ireland, Radical disagreement

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

Aktiviteter

ID: 86417942