Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Raffaele Rodogno

Shame and Guilt in Restorative Justice

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Afdeling for Filosofi
In this article, I examine the relevance and desirability of shame and guilt to restorative justice conferences. I argue that a careful study of the psychology of shame and guilt reveals that both emotions possess traits that can be desirable and traits that can be undesirable for restoration. More in particular, having presented the aims of restorative justice, the importance of face-to-face conferences in reaching these aims, the emotional dynamics that take place within such conferences, and the relevant parts of the empirical psychology of shame and guilt, I argue that restorative justice practitioners have to take account of a rather more complex picture than it had hitherto been thought. Restorative conferences are not simply about "shame management," though practitioners must certainly avoid shaming and humiliation. Given the nature of shame, guilt, and restorative conferences, it is not possible to provide a single concrete precept applicable to all restorative conferences. The successful holding of conferences depends in large part on the cultural and situational specificities at hand. The latter include among others knowledge of the perceived relations standing between victim and offender as well as the affective specificities of the individuals involved.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Vol/bind14
Nummer2
Sider (fra-til)142-176
Antal sider34
ISSN1076-8971
StatusUdgivet - 2008

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 15555633