Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Raffaele Rodogno

Guilt, Anger, and Retribution

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Afdeling for Filosofi
This article focuses primarily on the emotion of guilt as providing a justification for retributive legal punishment. In particular I shall challenge the claim according to which guilt can function as part of our epistemic justification in favour of positive retributivism, i.e., the view that wrongdoing is both necessary and sufficient to justify punishment. I will show that the argument to this conclusion rests on two premises: (a) to feel guilty typically involves the judgement that one deserves punishment; and (b) those who feel guilty after wrongdoing are more virtuous (or less vicious) than those who do not. I shall argue that (a) is false on empirical grounds; and that there are no particularly good reasons to believe (b). Finally, I will consider and reject the claim that anger, as opposed to guilt, can afford the type of epistemic justification needed by positive retributivism.
Udgivelsesdato: 2010
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftLegal Theory
Vol/bind16
Nummer1
ISSN1352-3252
StatusUdgivet - 2010

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 20059553