Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Peter Vedsted

The contribution of a negative colorectal screening test result to symptom appraisal and help-seeking behaviour among patients subsequently diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  • Karen N Barnett, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh
  • ,
  • David Weller, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh
  • ,
  • Steve Smith, Midlands and NW Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Hub, Rugby, UK.
  • ,
  • Robert Jc Steele, Dundee University
  • ,
  • Peter Vedsted
  • Sheina Orbell, School of Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester
  • ,
  • Sue M Moss, University of London/Queen Mary
  • ,
  • Jane W Melia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • ,
  • Julietta Patnick, University of Oxford, Oxford
  • ,
  • Christine Campbell, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes using a guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBt) reduce CRC mortality. Interval cancers are diagnosed between screening rounds: reassurance from a negative gFOBt has the potential to influence the pathway to diagnosis of an interval colorectal cancer.

METHODS: Twenty-six semi-structured face-to-face interviews were carried out in Scotland and England, with individuals diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer following a negative gFOBt result.

RESULTS: Participants reported they were reassured by a negative gFOBt, interpreting their result as an "all clear". Therefore, most did not suspect cancer as a possible cause of symptoms and many did not recall their screening result during symptom appraisal. Among those who did consider cancer, and did think about their screening test result, reassurance from a negative gFOBt led some to "downplay" the seriousness of their symptoms with some interviewees explicitly stating that their negative test result contributed to a delayed decision to seek help.

CONCLUSION: Screening participants need to be informed of the limitations of screening and the ongoing risk of developing colorectal cancer even when in receipt of a negative result: the importance of minimizing delay in seeking medical advice for colorectal symptoms should be emphasized.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftHealth Expectations
Vol/bind21
Sider (fra-til)764–773
ISSN1369-6513
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2018

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 121811017