Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Peter Vedsted

Reasons for Diagnostic Delay in Gynecological Malignancies

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Mai Partridge Vandborg
  • ,
  • René Depont Christensen
  • ,
  • Jakob Kragstrup
  • ,
  • Kasper Edwards
  • ,
  • Peter Vedsted
  • Dorte Gilså Hansen
  • ,
  • Ole Mogensen
  • Forskningsenheden for Almen Praksis
INTRODUCTION:: To describe the different delay types in women with gynecological cancer and to analyze the relationship between diagnostic delay and a number of characteristics for patients, cancers, and the health care system. METHOD:: Data were obtained from 4 different questionnaires, the Electronic Patient Journal (EPJ), and the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database (DGCD). A total of 161 women with ovarian cancer (63), endometrial cancer (50), cervical cancer (34), and vulvar cancer (14) were included. Outcome measures were different delay types counted in days and 4 clinically important variables' impact on the diagnostic delay: presence of alarm symptoms, age (divided into 2 groups: ≤60 or >60 years), performance of gynecological examination by the general practitioner (GP), and notification of cancer suspicion on first referral from GP. RESULTS:: Across cancer types, median total delay was 101 days. Some 10% of women experienced the longest delay with a total delay of 436 days or more. Vulva cancer had the longest delay, whereas women with ovarian cancer had the shortest delay. More than one third (39%) of the women consulted their GP for reasons other than the predefined alarm symptoms. Gynecological examination by the GP was less likely to be performed if the woman did not present with vaginal bleeding. The length of the delay was shortened by performance of a gynecological examination by the GP and a primary referral from the GP raising the receiver's suspicion of cancer. CONCLUSION:: Reducing diagnostic delays should be achievable, particularly for those most delayed, and interventions aimed at reducing delays need to be developed. Creation of new valid instruments for measuring delay is essential in future research.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Vol/bind21
Nummer6
Sider (fra-til)967-974
Antal sider8
ISSN1048-891X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 aug. 2011

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 39759904