Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Peter Vedsted

Prognosis of cancer in persons with infrequent consultations in general practice: A population-based cohort study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Prognosis of cancer in persons with infrequent consultations in general practice : A population-based cohort study. / Jensen, Henry; Vedsted, Peter; Møller, Henrik.

I: International Journal of Cancer, Bind 141, Nr. 12, 15.12.2017, s. 2400-2409.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{d7fa33768d8c482a8ebea2e04ff825c3,
title = "Prognosis of cancer in persons with infrequent consultations in general practice: A population-based cohort study",
abstract = "Cancer survival rates are lower in Denmark than in comparable European countries. This may partly be attributable to subgroups of cancer patients who seek medical attention at late disease stages. It is unknown if differences in usual (i.e. customary) consultation frequency in general practice are associated with cancer prognosis. We aimed to estimate the cancer prognosis of cancer patients stratified by their usual consultation frequency in general practice. We performed a population-based cohort study including 123,943 incident cancer patients aged 50-89 years diagnosed in Denmark in 2009-2013. We estimated associations between the patient's usual general practitioner (GP) consultation frequency 19-36 months before the cancer diagnosis and all-cause mortality by using hazard ratios (HR), estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression. We also estimated the associations between the patient's usual GP consultation frequency and tumour stage, by using logistic regression estimates of odds ratios (ORs). Patients who usually did not see their GP (non-consulters) had higher all-cause mortality (HR=1.39 (95{\%} CI: 1.33-1.44)) compared to patients who usually saw their GP three to five times during an 18 months period (average consulters). Non-consulters had higher odds of having distant tumour stage (OR=1.46 (95{\%} CI: 1.38-1.57)) than average consulters. Similar, yet less strong, patterns were seen among patients with low usual GP consultation frequency, yet not statistically significant for all cancer types. In conclusion, the association between usual GP non-consultation and cancer prognosis is a combination of at least two things: a mechanism through more advanced tumour stage and other independent factors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Henry Jensen and Peter Vedsted and Henrik M{\o}ller",
note = "{\circledC} 2017 UICC.",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/ijc.30916",
language = "English",
volume = "141",
pages = "2400--2409",
journal = "International Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0020-7136",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognosis of cancer in persons with infrequent consultations in general practice

T2 - A population-based cohort study

AU - Jensen, Henry

AU - Vedsted, Peter

AU - Møller, Henrik

N1 - © 2017 UICC.

PY - 2017/12/15

Y1 - 2017/12/15

N2 - Cancer survival rates are lower in Denmark than in comparable European countries. This may partly be attributable to subgroups of cancer patients who seek medical attention at late disease stages. It is unknown if differences in usual (i.e. customary) consultation frequency in general practice are associated with cancer prognosis. We aimed to estimate the cancer prognosis of cancer patients stratified by their usual consultation frequency in general practice. We performed a population-based cohort study including 123,943 incident cancer patients aged 50-89 years diagnosed in Denmark in 2009-2013. We estimated associations between the patient's usual general practitioner (GP) consultation frequency 19-36 months before the cancer diagnosis and all-cause mortality by using hazard ratios (HR), estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression. We also estimated the associations between the patient's usual GP consultation frequency and tumour stage, by using logistic regression estimates of odds ratios (ORs). Patients who usually did not see their GP (non-consulters) had higher all-cause mortality (HR=1.39 (95% CI: 1.33-1.44)) compared to patients who usually saw their GP three to five times during an 18 months period (average consulters). Non-consulters had higher odds of having distant tumour stage (OR=1.46 (95% CI: 1.38-1.57)) than average consulters. Similar, yet less strong, patterns were seen among patients with low usual GP consultation frequency, yet not statistically significant for all cancer types. In conclusion, the association between usual GP non-consultation and cancer prognosis is a combination of at least two things: a mechanism through more advanced tumour stage and other independent factors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

AB - Cancer survival rates are lower in Denmark than in comparable European countries. This may partly be attributable to subgroups of cancer patients who seek medical attention at late disease stages. It is unknown if differences in usual (i.e. customary) consultation frequency in general practice are associated with cancer prognosis. We aimed to estimate the cancer prognosis of cancer patients stratified by their usual consultation frequency in general practice. We performed a population-based cohort study including 123,943 incident cancer patients aged 50-89 years diagnosed in Denmark in 2009-2013. We estimated associations between the patient's usual general practitioner (GP) consultation frequency 19-36 months before the cancer diagnosis and all-cause mortality by using hazard ratios (HR), estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression. We also estimated the associations between the patient's usual GP consultation frequency and tumour stage, by using logistic regression estimates of odds ratios (ORs). Patients who usually did not see their GP (non-consulters) had higher all-cause mortality (HR=1.39 (95% CI: 1.33-1.44)) compared to patients who usually saw their GP three to five times during an 18 months period (average consulters). Non-consulters had higher odds of having distant tumour stage (OR=1.46 (95% CI: 1.38-1.57)) than average consulters. Similar, yet less strong, patterns were seen among patients with low usual GP consultation frequency, yet not statistically significant for all cancer types. In conclusion, the association between usual GP non-consultation and cancer prognosis is a combination of at least two things: a mechanism through more advanced tumour stage and other independent factors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1002/ijc.30916

DO - 10.1002/ijc.30916

M3 - Journal article

VL - 141

SP - 2400

EP - 2409

JO - International Journal of Cancer

JF - International Journal of Cancer

SN - 0020-7136

IS - 12

ER -