Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Peter Vedsted

Development of a survey instrument to investigate the primary care factors related to differences in cancer diagnosis between international jurisdictions

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Development of a survey instrument to investigate the primary care factors related to differences in cancer diagnosis between international jurisdictions. / Rose, Peter W; Hamilton, Willie; Aldersey, Kate; Barisic, Andriana; Dawes, Martin; Foot, Catherine; Grunfeld, Eva; Hart, Nigel; Neal, Richard D; Pirotta, Marie; Sisler, Jeffrey; Thulesius, Hans; Vedsted, Peter; Young, Jane; Rubin, Greg; ICBP Module 3 Working Group*.

I: B M C Family Practice, Bind 15, Nr. 1, 2014, s. 122.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

Rose, PW, Hamilton, W, Aldersey, K, Barisic, A, Dawes, M, Foot, C, Grunfeld, E, Hart, N, Neal, RD, Pirotta, M, Sisler, J, Thulesius, H, Vedsted, P, Young, J, Rubin, G & ICBP Module 3 Working Group* 2014, 'Development of a survey instrument to investigate the primary care factors related to differences in cancer diagnosis between international jurisdictions', B M C Family Practice, bind 15, nr. 1, s. 122. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-122

APA

Rose, P. W., Hamilton, W., Aldersey, K., Barisic, A., Dawes, M., Foot, C., ... ICBP Module 3 Working Group* (2014). Development of a survey instrument to investigate the primary care factors related to differences in cancer diagnosis between international jurisdictions. B M C Family Practice, 15(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-122

CBE

Rose PW, Hamilton W, Aldersey K, Barisic A, Dawes M, Foot C, Grunfeld E, Hart N, Neal RD, Pirotta M, Sisler J, Thulesius H, Vedsted P, Young J, Rubin G, ICBP Module 3 Working Group*. 2014. Development of a survey instrument to investigate the primary care factors related to differences in cancer diagnosis between international jurisdictions. B M C Family Practice. 15(1):122. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-122

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Rose, Peter W ; Hamilton, Willie ; Aldersey, Kate ; Barisic, Andriana ; Dawes, Martin ; Foot, Catherine ; Grunfeld, Eva ; Hart, Nigel ; Neal, Richard D ; Pirotta, Marie ; Sisler, Jeffrey ; Thulesius, Hans ; Vedsted, Peter ; Young, Jane ; Rubin, Greg ; ICBP Module 3 Working Group*. / Development of a survey instrument to investigate the primary care factors related to differences in cancer diagnosis between international jurisdictions. I: B M C Family Practice. 2014 ; Bind 15, Nr. 1. s. 122.

Bibtex

@article{4b89f11e35f1436ab844aa20386e7476,
title = "Development of a survey instrument to investigate the primary care factors related to differences in cancer diagnosis between international jurisdictions",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Survival rates following a diagnosis of cancer vary between countries. The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP), a collaboration between six countries with primary care led health services, was set up in 2009 to investigate the causes of these differences. Module 3 of this collaboration hypothesised that an association exists between the readiness of primary care physicians (PCP) to investigate for cancer - the 'threshold' risk level at which they investigate or refer to a specialist for consideration of possible cancer - and survival for that cancer (lung, colorectal and ovarian). We describe the development of an international survey instrument to test this hypothesis.METHODS: The work was led by an academic steering group in England. They agreed that an online survey was the most pragmatic way of identifying differences between the jurisdictions. Research questions were identified through clinical experience and expert knowledge of the relevant literature.A survey comprising a set of direct questions and five clinical scenarios was developed to investigate the hypothesis. The survey content was discussed and refined concurrently and repeatedly with international partners. The survey was validated using an iterative process in England. Following validation the survey was adapted to be relevant to the health systems operating in other jurisdictions and translated into Danish, Norwegian and Swedish, and into Canadian and Australian English.RESULTS: This work has produced a survey with face, content and cross cultural validity that will be circulated in all six countries. It could also form a benchmark for similar surveys in countries with similar health care systems.CONCLUSIONS: The vignettes could also be used as educational resources. This study is likely to impact on healthcare policy and practice in participating countries.",
author = "Rose, {Peter W} and Willie Hamilton and Kate Aldersey and Andriana Barisic and Martin Dawes and Catherine Foot and Eva Grunfeld and Nigel Hart and Neal, {Richard D} and Marie Pirotta and Jeffrey Sisler and Hans Thulesius and Peter Vedsted and Jane Young and Greg Rubin and {ICBP Module 3 Working Group*}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2296-15-122",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "122",
journal = "B M C Family Practice",
issn = "1471-2296",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a survey instrument to investigate the primary care factors related to differences in cancer diagnosis between international jurisdictions

AU - Rose, Peter W

AU - Hamilton, Willie

AU - Aldersey, Kate

AU - Barisic, Andriana

AU - Dawes, Martin

AU - Foot, Catherine

AU - Grunfeld, Eva

AU - Hart, Nigel

AU - Neal, Richard D

AU - Pirotta, Marie

AU - Sisler, Jeffrey

AU - Thulesius, Hans

AU - Vedsted, Peter

AU - Young, Jane

AU - Rubin, Greg

AU - ICBP Module 3 Working Group

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - BACKGROUND: Survival rates following a diagnosis of cancer vary between countries. The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP), a collaboration between six countries with primary care led health services, was set up in 2009 to investigate the causes of these differences. Module 3 of this collaboration hypothesised that an association exists between the readiness of primary care physicians (PCP) to investigate for cancer - the 'threshold' risk level at which they investigate or refer to a specialist for consideration of possible cancer - and survival for that cancer (lung, colorectal and ovarian). We describe the development of an international survey instrument to test this hypothesis.METHODS: The work was led by an academic steering group in England. They agreed that an online survey was the most pragmatic way of identifying differences between the jurisdictions. Research questions were identified through clinical experience and expert knowledge of the relevant literature.A survey comprising a set of direct questions and five clinical scenarios was developed to investigate the hypothesis. The survey content was discussed and refined concurrently and repeatedly with international partners. The survey was validated using an iterative process in England. Following validation the survey was adapted to be relevant to the health systems operating in other jurisdictions and translated into Danish, Norwegian and Swedish, and into Canadian and Australian English.RESULTS: This work has produced a survey with face, content and cross cultural validity that will be circulated in all six countries. It could also form a benchmark for similar surveys in countries with similar health care systems.CONCLUSIONS: The vignettes could also be used as educational resources. This study is likely to impact on healthcare policy and practice in participating countries.

AB - BACKGROUND: Survival rates following a diagnosis of cancer vary between countries. The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP), a collaboration between six countries with primary care led health services, was set up in 2009 to investigate the causes of these differences. Module 3 of this collaboration hypothesised that an association exists between the readiness of primary care physicians (PCP) to investigate for cancer - the 'threshold' risk level at which they investigate or refer to a specialist for consideration of possible cancer - and survival for that cancer (lung, colorectal and ovarian). We describe the development of an international survey instrument to test this hypothesis.METHODS: The work was led by an academic steering group in England. They agreed that an online survey was the most pragmatic way of identifying differences between the jurisdictions. Research questions were identified through clinical experience and expert knowledge of the relevant literature.A survey comprising a set of direct questions and five clinical scenarios was developed to investigate the hypothesis. The survey content was discussed and refined concurrently and repeatedly with international partners. The survey was validated using an iterative process in England. Following validation the survey was adapted to be relevant to the health systems operating in other jurisdictions and translated into Danish, Norwegian and Swedish, and into Canadian and Australian English.RESULTS: This work has produced a survey with face, content and cross cultural validity that will be circulated in all six countries. It could also form a benchmark for similar surveys in countries with similar health care systems.CONCLUSIONS: The vignettes could also be used as educational resources. This study is likely to impact on healthcare policy and practice in participating countries.

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2296-15-122

DO - 10.1186/1471-2296-15-122

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24938306

VL - 15

SP - 122

JO - B M C Family Practice

JF - B M C Family Practice

SN - 1471-2296

IS - 1

ER -