Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Peer Bundgaard

Are cross-domain mappings psychologically real, but conceptually shallow? What is still left to test for Conceptual Metaphor Theory.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Are cross-domain mappings psychologically real, but conceptually shallow? What is still left to test for Conceptual Metaphor Theory. / Bundgaard, Peer.

I: Cognitive Semiotics, 2014, s. 401-407.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{dff161955aea4c728e0ed24f01dc4b96,
title = "Are cross-domain mappings psychologically real, but conceptually shallow? What is still left to test for Conceptual Metaphor Theory.",
author = "Peer Bundgaard",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.400",
language = "English",
pages = "401--407",
journal = "Cognitive Semiotics",
issn = "1662-1425",
publisher = "De Gruyter Mouton",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are cross-domain mappings psychologically real, but conceptually shallow? What is still left to test for Conceptual Metaphor Theory.

AU - Bundgaard, Peer

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

U2 - 10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.400

DO - 10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.400

M3 - Journal article

SP - 401

EP - 407

JO - Cognitive Semiotics

JF - Cognitive Semiotics

SN - 1662-1425

ER -