Niels Okkels

Fifty years' development and future perspectives of psychiatric register research

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Fifty years' development and future perspectives of psychiatric register research. / Munk-Jørgensen, P; Okkels, Niels; Golberg, D et al.

I: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Bind 130, Nr. 2, 08.2014, s. 87-98.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

Munk-Jørgensen, P, Okkels, N, Golberg, D, Ruggeri, M & Thornicroft, G 2014, 'Fifty years' development and future perspectives of psychiatric register research', Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, bind 130, nr. 2, s. 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12281

APA

Munk-Jørgensen, P., Okkels, N., Golberg, D., Ruggeri, M., & Thornicroft, G. (2014). Fifty years' development and future perspectives of psychiatric register research. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 130(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12281

CBE

Munk-Jørgensen P, Okkels N, Golberg D, Ruggeri M, Thornicroft G. 2014. Fifty years' development and future perspectives of psychiatric register research. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 130(2):87-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12281

MLA

Munk-Jørgensen, P et al. "Fifty years' development and future perspectives of psychiatric register research". Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2014, 130(2). 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12281

Vancouver

Munk-Jørgensen P, Okkels N, Golberg D, Ruggeri M, Thornicroft G. Fifty years' development and future perspectives of psychiatric register research. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2014 aug.;130(2):87-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12281

Author

Munk-Jørgensen, P ; Okkels, Niels ; Golberg, D et al. / Fifty years' development and future perspectives of psychiatric register research. I: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2014 ; Bind 130, Nr. 2. s. 87-98.

Bibtex

@article{f131d3d26e4d42bdb53432de59d6f300,
title = "Fifty years' development and future perspectives of psychiatric register research",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: This article illustrates the development of psychiatric register research and discusses the strengths, limitations, and possible directions for future activities.METHOD: Examples illustrating the development from the post-World War II introduction of psychiatric register research until today are selected.RESULTS: The strengths of register research are seen especially within health service. Until recently, when starting linking registers to biobanks, register research had limited value in cause-seeking. Register research benefits from the possibilities for following identifiable persons over long time (lifelong) and the possibilities for linking to other registers and databases. Important limitations of register research are the heterogeneity and questionable validity of the clinical data collected.CONCLUSION: Future register research can go in the direction of big is beautiful collecting data from all possible sources creating giga-registers. In that case, low data quality will still be an unsolved problem. Or it can take the direction of smaller local clinical databases which has many advantages, for example, integrating clinical knowledge and experience into register research. However, in that case, registers will not be able to deal with rare conditions and diseases.",
author = "P Munk-J{\o}rgensen and Niels Okkels and D Golberg and M Ruggeri and G Thornicroft",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2014",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1111/acps.12281",
language = "English",
volume = "130",
pages = "87--98",
journal = "Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-690X",
publisher = "Jossey-Bass",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fifty years' development and future perspectives of psychiatric register research

AU - Munk-Jørgensen, P

AU - Okkels, Niels

AU - Golberg, D

AU - Ruggeri, M

AU - Thornicroft, G

N1 - © 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - OBJECTIVE: This article illustrates the development of psychiatric register research and discusses the strengths, limitations, and possible directions for future activities.METHOD: Examples illustrating the development from the post-World War II introduction of psychiatric register research until today are selected.RESULTS: The strengths of register research are seen especially within health service. Until recently, when starting linking registers to biobanks, register research had limited value in cause-seeking. Register research benefits from the possibilities for following identifiable persons over long time (lifelong) and the possibilities for linking to other registers and databases. Important limitations of register research are the heterogeneity and questionable validity of the clinical data collected.CONCLUSION: Future register research can go in the direction of big is beautiful collecting data from all possible sources creating giga-registers. In that case, low data quality will still be an unsolved problem. Or it can take the direction of smaller local clinical databases which has many advantages, for example, integrating clinical knowledge and experience into register research. However, in that case, registers will not be able to deal with rare conditions and diseases.

AB - OBJECTIVE: This article illustrates the development of psychiatric register research and discusses the strengths, limitations, and possible directions for future activities.METHOD: Examples illustrating the development from the post-World War II introduction of psychiatric register research until today are selected.RESULTS: The strengths of register research are seen especially within health service. Until recently, when starting linking registers to biobanks, register research had limited value in cause-seeking. Register research benefits from the possibilities for following identifiable persons over long time (lifelong) and the possibilities for linking to other registers and databases. Important limitations of register research are the heterogeneity and questionable validity of the clinical data collected.CONCLUSION: Future register research can go in the direction of big is beautiful collecting data from all possible sources creating giga-registers. In that case, low data quality will still be an unsolved problem. Or it can take the direction of smaller local clinical databases which has many advantages, for example, integrating clinical knowledge and experience into register research. However, in that case, registers will not be able to deal with rare conditions and diseases.

U2 - 10.1111/acps.12281

DO - 10.1111/acps.12281

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24749690

VL - 130

SP - 87

EP - 98

JO - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-690X

IS - 2

ER -