Louise Hauge Matzen

Factors affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone beam computed tomography examination

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Factors affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone beam computed tomography examination. / Spin-Neto, Rubens; Matzen, Louise Hauge; Schropp, Lars; Gotfredsen, Erik; Wenzel, Ann.

I: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, Bind 119, Nr. 5, 03.02.2015, s. 572-578.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Spin-Neto, Rubens ; Matzen, Louise Hauge ; Schropp, Lars ; Gotfredsen, Erik ; Wenzel, Ann. / Factors affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone beam computed tomography examination. I: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2015 ; Bind 119, Nr. 5. s. 572-578.

Bibtex

@article{3c54c5e4fa874570adff195a43d82e02,
title = "Factors affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone beam computed tomography examination",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To assess operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors, affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination.STUDY DESIGN: The sample consisted of 248 CBCT examinations in 190 patients video-recorded during examination. Three observers scored the videos; the patient moved or did not move. Operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors were evaluated separately (chi-square test) and by multivariate regression analyses (patient movement and re-exposure as separate outcomes).RESULTS: The prevalence of movement was 21%. Cotton roll stabilizing patient's jaws, CBCT unit touching patient's hair, and patient's age 15 years or greater were related to movement. Age 15 years or greater had a significant impact on movement (P < .001; odds ratio [OR] 11.0). There were 16 re-exposures (6.4%). Age 15 years or greater, presence of a cotton roll, and field of view (FOV) were related to re-exposure. Use of a large FOV had significant impact on re-exposure (P = .04; OR 5.8).CONCLUSIONS: Operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors may affect patient movement and re-exposure in CBCT examination.",
author = "Rubens Spin-Neto and Matzen, {Louise Hauge} and Lars Schropp and Erik Gotfredsen and Ann Wenzel",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2015",
month = feb,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.oooo.2015.01.011",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "572--578",
journal = "Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology",
issn = "1079-2104",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone beam computed tomography examination

AU - Spin-Neto, Rubens

AU - Matzen, Louise Hauge

AU - Schropp, Lars

AU - Gotfredsen, Erik

AU - Wenzel, Ann

N1 - Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2015/2/3

Y1 - 2015/2/3

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors, affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination.STUDY DESIGN: The sample consisted of 248 CBCT examinations in 190 patients video-recorded during examination. Three observers scored the videos; the patient moved or did not move. Operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors were evaluated separately (chi-square test) and by multivariate regression analyses (patient movement and re-exposure as separate outcomes).RESULTS: The prevalence of movement was 21%. Cotton roll stabilizing patient's jaws, CBCT unit touching patient's hair, and patient's age 15 years or greater were related to movement. Age 15 years or greater had a significant impact on movement (P < .001; odds ratio [OR] 11.0). There were 16 re-exposures (6.4%). Age 15 years or greater, presence of a cotton roll, and field of view (FOV) were related to re-exposure. Use of a large FOV had significant impact on re-exposure (P = .04; OR 5.8).CONCLUSIONS: Operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors may affect patient movement and re-exposure in CBCT examination.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To assess operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors, affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination.STUDY DESIGN: The sample consisted of 248 CBCT examinations in 190 patients video-recorded during examination. Three observers scored the videos; the patient moved or did not move. Operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors were evaluated separately (chi-square test) and by multivariate regression analyses (patient movement and re-exposure as separate outcomes).RESULTS: The prevalence of movement was 21%. Cotton roll stabilizing patient's jaws, CBCT unit touching patient's hair, and patient's age 15 years or greater were related to movement. Age 15 years or greater had a significant impact on movement (P < .001; odds ratio [OR] 11.0). There were 16 re-exposures (6.4%). Age 15 years or greater, presence of a cotton roll, and field of view (FOV) were related to re-exposure. Use of a large FOV had significant impact on re-exposure (P = .04; OR 5.8).CONCLUSIONS: Operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors may affect patient movement and re-exposure in CBCT examination.

U2 - 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.01.011

DO - 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.01.011

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25767069

VL - 119

SP - 572

EP - 578

JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology

JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology

SN - 1079-2104

IS - 5

ER -