Katrine J Emmertsen

Chronic pain after rectal cancer surgery - development and validation of a scoring system

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Chronic pain after rectal cancer surgery - development and validation of a scoring system. / Mortensen, A R; Thyø, A; Emmertsen, K J; Laurberg, S.

I: Colorectal Disease, Bind 21, Nr. 1, 09.2018, s. 90-99.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{fe1fcba35ec74b8d8f002af26d5b2d2c,
title = "Chronic pain after rectal cancer surgery - development and validation of a scoring system",
abstract = "AIM: The aim was to develop and validate a scoring system for the assessment of chronic pain on quality of life (QoL) following surgical treatment of rectal cancer (RC).METHOD: Patients diagnosed with RC between 2001 and 2014 in Denmark were evaluated for inclusion. Eligible patients were mailed questionnaires concerning pain and QoL. Questionnaire items were associated with QoL by odds ratio using regression analyses. The patients were randomized into a development group and a validation group. The most significant items were each assigned a score value based on multivariate-adjusted odds ratio. Validity was tested in the validation group using receiver operating characteristic curves and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-30).RESULTS: A total of 1928 eligible patients completed the questionnaire; 1072 were randomized to the development group and 856 to the validation group. The calculated scores included the six most important questionnaire items giving a score range of 0-45 which identified three groups: no significant pain, minor pain syndrome and major pain syndrome. Our results suggest a significant correlation between QoL assessment and the presence of major pain.CONCLUSION: We have developed and validated a reliable, QoL-based scoring system for chronic post-surgical pain following RC.",
author = "Mortensen, {A R} and A Thy{\o} and Emmertsen, {K J} and S Laurberg",
note = "Colorectal Disease {\textcopyright} 2018 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.",
year = "2018",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1111/codi.14436",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "90--99",
journal = "Colorectal Disease",
issn = "1462-8910",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chronic pain after rectal cancer surgery - development and validation of a scoring system

AU - Mortensen, A R

AU - Thyø, A

AU - Emmertsen, K J

AU - Laurberg, S

N1 - Colorectal Disease © 2018 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - AIM: The aim was to develop and validate a scoring system for the assessment of chronic pain on quality of life (QoL) following surgical treatment of rectal cancer (RC).METHOD: Patients diagnosed with RC between 2001 and 2014 in Denmark were evaluated for inclusion. Eligible patients were mailed questionnaires concerning pain and QoL. Questionnaire items were associated with QoL by odds ratio using regression analyses. The patients were randomized into a development group and a validation group. The most significant items were each assigned a score value based on multivariate-adjusted odds ratio. Validity was tested in the validation group using receiver operating characteristic curves and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-30).RESULTS: A total of 1928 eligible patients completed the questionnaire; 1072 were randomized to the development group and 856 to the validation group. The calculated scores included the six most important questionnaire items giving a score range of 0-45 which identified three groups: no significant pain, minor pain syndrome and major pain syndrome. Our results suggest a significant correlation between QoL assessment and the presence of major pain.CONCLUSION: We have developed and validated a reliable, QoL-based scoring system for chronic post-surgical pain following RC.

AB - AIM: The aim was to develop and validate a scoring system for the assessment of chronic pain on quality of life (QoL) following surgical treatment of rectal cancer (RC).METHOD: Patients diagnosed with RC between 2001 and 2014 in Denmark were evaluated for inclusion. Eligible patients were mailed questionnaires concerning pain and QoL. Questionnaire items were associated with QoL by odds ratio using regression analyses. The patients were randomized into a development group and a validation group. The most significant items were each assigned a score value based on multivariate-adjusted odds ratio. Validity was tested in the validation group using receiver operating characteristic curves and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-30).RESULTS: A total of 1928 eligible patients completed the questionnaire; 1072 were randomized to the development group and 856 to the validation group. The calculated scores included the six most important questionnaire items giving a score range of 0-45 which identified three groups: no significant pain, minor pain syndrome and major pain syndrome. Our results suggest a significant correlation between QoL assessment and the presence of major pain.CONCLUSION: We have developed and validated a reliable, QoL-based scoring system for chronic post-surgical pain following RC.

U2 - 10.1111/codi.14436

DO - 10.1111/codi.14436

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30269401

VL - 21

SP - 90

EP - 99

JO - Colorectal Disease

JF - Colorectal Disease

SN - 1462-8910

IS - 1

ER -