Aarhus Universitets segl

Jens Christian Jensenius

Assay interference caused by antibodies reacting with rat kappa light-chain in human sera

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Assay interference caused by antibodies reacting with rat kappa light-chain in human sera. / Degn, Søren Egedal; Andersen, Stig Henrik; Jensen, Lisbeth et al.
I: Journal of Immunological Methods, Bind 372, Nr. 1-2, 2011, s. 204-8.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{7e45c27ca0c24ff3969e880431554016,
title = "Assay interference caused by antibodies reacting with rat kappa light-chain in human sera",
abstract = "The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and its derivatives are powerful tools used in research, in the clinic, and in many other analytical and quality control settings. In general, ELISAs are robust, reproducible and reliable. However, a number of pitfalls of ELISAs have been described over the years. The issue of rheumatoid factor (RF), autoantibodies against the Fc portion of IgG, is well recognized (yet often forgotten), as are problems arising from heterophilic antibodies induced by external antigens that cross-react with self-antigens. A few years ago focus was on human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) concomitant with the increased use of mouse monoclonal antibody therapy, a problem that is now diminishing due to development of humanized antibodies. Issues pertaining to food antigens or environmentally encountered antigens are less recognized. We report a recently encountered example of the latter resulting in interference in a solid-phase sandwich assay. Due to the set-up employing a monoclonal rat IgG for capture and a monoclonal rat IgM for development the interference had to be human antibodies reacting with rat light-chain. Out of 102 Danish Caucasian blood donors we found a prevalence of anti-rat kappa light chain antibodies of close to 40% (39/102, defined as at least 2-fold elevated measurements), with around 6% (6/102) having very high levels (defined as at least 4-fold elevated measurements), yielding significantly higher measurements in the assay designed to measure the complement component MAp19 in serum samples. The interference could be blocked by the addition of rat immunoglobulin to the sample buffer. An individual, who had been followed over time, demonstrated a periodic increase of interfering antibodies, highlighting that it is an independently varying parameter and thereby a variable interference in assays. Our results highlight a major pitfall of potential relevance to many sandwich-type assays, as well as an approach to rectify such problems.",
keywords = "Animals, Blood Donors, Cohort Studies, Cross Reactions, Denmark, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, False Positive Reactions, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin kappa-Chains, Mannose-Binding Protein-Associated Serine Proteases, Rats",
author = "Degn, {S{\o}ren Egedal} and Andersen, {Stig Henrik} and Lisbeth Jensen and Steffen Thiel and Jensenius, {Jens C}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.jim.2011.06.030",
language = "English",
volume = "372",
pages = "204--8",
journal = "Journal of Immunological Methods",
issn = "0022-1759",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1-2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assay interference caused by antibodies reacting with rat kappa light-chain in human sera

AU - Degn, Søren Egedal

AU - Andersen, Stig Henrik

AU - Jensen, Lisbeth

AU - Thiel, Steffen

AU - Jensenius, Jens C

N1 - Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and its derivatives are powerful tools used in research, in the clinic, and in many other analytical and quality control settings. In general, ELISAs are robust, reproducible and reliable. However, a number of pitfalls of ELISAs have been described over the years. The issue of rheumatoid factor (RF), autoantibodies against the Fc portion of IgG, is well recognized (yet often forgotten), as are problems arising from heterophilic antibodies induced by external antigens that cross-react with self-antigens. A few years ago focus was on human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) concomitant with the increased use of mouse monoclonal antibody therapy, a problem that is now diminishing due to development of humanized antibodies. Issues pertaining to food antigens or environmentally encountered antigens are less recognized. We report a recently encountered example of the latter resulting in interference in a solid-phase sandwich assay. Due to the set-up employing a monoclonal rat IgG for capture and a monoclonal rat IgM for development the interference had to be human antibodies reacting with rat light-chain. Out of 102 Danish Caucasian blood donors we found a prevalence of anti-rat kappa light chain antibodies of close to 40% (39/102, defined as at least 2-fold elevated measurements), with around 6% (6/102) having very high levels (defined as at least 4-fold elevated measurements), yielding significantly higher measurements in the assay designed to measure the complement component MAp19 in serum samples. The interference could be blocked by the addition of rat immunoglobulin to the sample buffer. An individual, who had been followed over time, demonstrated a periodic increase of interfering antibodies, highlighting that it is an independently varying parameter and thereby a variable interference in assays. Our results highlight a major pitfall of potential relevance to many sandwich-type assays, as well as an approach to rectify such problems.

AB - The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and its derivatives are powerful tools used in research, in the clinic, and in many other analytical and quality control settings. In general, ELISAs are robust, reproducible and reliable. However, a number of pitfalls of ELISAs have been described over the years. The issue of rheumatoid factor (RF), autoantibodies against the Fc portion of IgG, is well recognized (yet often forgotten), as are problems arising from heterophilic antibodies induced by external antigens that cross-react with self-antigens. A few years ago focus was on human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) concomitant with the increased use of mouse monoclonal antibody therapy, a problem that is now diminishing due to development of humanized antibodies. Issues pertaining to food antigens or environmentally encountered antigens are less recognized. We report a recently encountered example of the latter resulting in interference in a solid-phase sandwich assay. Due to the set-up employing a monoclonal rat IgG for capture and a monoclonal rat IgM for development the interference had to be human antibodies reacting with rat light-chain. Out of 102 Danish Caucasian blood donors we found a prevalence of anti-rat kappa light chain antibodies of close to 40% (39/102, defined as at least 2-fold elevated measurements), with around 6% (6/102) having very high levels (defined as at least 4-fold elevated measurements), yielding significantly higher measurements in the assay designed to measure the complement component MAp19 in serum samples. The interference could be blocked by the addition of rat immunoglobulin to the sample buffer. An individual, who had been followed over time, demonstrated a periodic increase of interfering antibodies, highlighting that it is an independently varying parameter and thereby a variable interference in assays. Our results highlight a major pitfall of potential relevance to many sandwich-type assays, as well as an approach to rectify such problems.

KW - Animals

KW - Blood Donors

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Cross Reactions

KW - Denmark

KW - Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

KW - False Positive Reactions

KW - Humans

KW - Immunoglobulin G

KW - Immunoglobulin kappa-Chains

KW - Mannose-Binding Protein-Associated Serine Proteases

KW - Rats

U2 - 10.1016/j.jim.2011.06.030

DO - 10.1016/j.jim.2011.06.030

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21771595

VL - 372

SP - 204

EP - 208

JO - Journal of Immunological Methods

JF - Journal of Immunological Methods

SN - 0022-1759

IS - 1-2

ER -