Institut for Virksomhedsledelse

Henning Bergenholtz

Conceptions for different types of language tools

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/proceedingBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

The occupation of lexicography by linguistics has serious adverse effects on the theoretical development of metalexicography and the physical products of dictionary work. In particular, the British tradition in which lexicography is classified as a field without theory and for which the linguistic theories should suffice is sharply criticised. The German tradition, while arguing at a high theoretic level, also uses the linguistic theories and forms of presenting research. The view that dictionaries must of necessity document extensively in the form of polyfunctional dictionaries is part and parcel of this traditional perspective. This does not apply to printed dictionaries only, but allegedly also – or even specifically – to internet dictionaries. The counterthesis postulated in this contribution is that the internet makes it even more possible than printed dictionaries to produce monofunctional dictionaries which, depending on their function, can be derived from one and the same database.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelLanguage Science and Language Technology in Africa : Festschrift for Justus C. Roux
RedaktørerHugues Steve Ndinga-Koumba-Binza, Sonja E. Bosch
Antal sider12
UdgivelsesstedStellenbosch
ForlagSun Press
Udgivelsesår2012
Sider328-339
ISBN (trykt)978-1-920338-79-4
ISBN (Elektronisk)978-1-920338-80-0
StatusUdgivet - 2012

Bibliografisk note

Haves ikke

    Forskningsområder

  • lexicography, dictionary, e-lexicography, polyfunctional, monofunctional

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 52060965