Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

David Charles Harvey

Landscape and Heritage: trajectories and consequences

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Landscape and Heritage: trajectories and consequences. / Harvey, David.

I: Landscape Research, Bind 40, Nr. 8, DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2014.967668, 2015, s. 911-924.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

Harvey, D 2015, 'Landscape and Heritage: trajectories and consequences', Landscape Research, bind 40, nr. 8, DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2014.967668, s. 911-924.

APA

Harvey, D. (2015). Landscape and Heritage: trajectories and consequences. Landscape Research, 40(8), 911-924. [DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2014.967668].

CBE

Harvey D. 2015. Landscape and Heritage: trajectories and consequences. Landscape Research. 40(8):911-924.

MLA

Vancouver

Harvey D. Landscape and Heritage: trajectories and consequences. Landscape Research. 2015;40(8):911-924. DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2014.967668.

Author

Harvey, David. / Landscape and Heritage: trajectories and consequences. I: Landscape Research. 2015 ; Bind 40, Nr. 8. s. 911-924.

Bibtex

@article{5636b4c871074391baa40ff30fafa421,
title = "Landscape and Heritage: trajectories and consequences",
abstract = "The recent histories of heritage and landscape studies appear to be closely linked, with their epistemological, ideological and methodological twists and turns progressing amid a common broad intellectual and interdisciplinary space. This has not been a codependent evolution, but rather, a mutually supporting and often parallel endeavour of academic, policy and popular inquiry that explores the significance of landscape and heritage as meaningful categoriesof an emergent and processual nature. Despite such a parallel trajectory, however, the actual practices of landscape and heritage studies still have a good deal to learn from further conversation. In particular, the paper explores how a heritage sensibility might provide some supportive critical purchase for some recent work within landscape studies that draws on phenomenological and non-representational theories. Thus, the paper sets out the co-ordinates of how work within landscape studies and heritage studies can move forward through an interdisciplinary dialogue.",
author = "David Harvey",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "911--924",
journal = "Landscape Research",
issn = "0142-6397",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Landscape and Heritage: trajectories and consequences

AU - Harvey, David

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The recent histories of heritage and landscape studies appear to be closely linked, with their epistemological, ideological and methodological twists and turns progressing amid a common broad intellectual and interdisciplinary space. This has not been a codependent evolution, but rather, a mutually supporting and often parallel endeavour of academic, policy and popular inquiry that explores the significance of landscape and heritage as meaningful categoriesof an emergent and processual nature. Despite such a parallel trajectory, however, the actual practices of landscape and heritage studies still have a good deal to learn from further conversation. In particular, the paper explores how a heritage sensibility might provide some supportive critical purchase for some recent work within landscape studies that draws on phenomenological and non-representational theories. Thus, the paper sets out the co-ordinates of how work within landscape studies and heritage studies can move forward through an interdisciplinary dialogue.

AB - The recent histories of heritage and landscape studies appear to be closely linked, with their epistemological, ideological and methodological twists and turns progressing amid a common broad intellectual and interdisciplinary space. This has not been a codependent evolution, but rather, a mutually supporting and often parallel endeavour of academic, policy and popular inquiry that explores the significance of landscape and heritage as meaningful categoriesof an emergent and processual nature. Despite such a parallel trajectory, however, the actual practices of landscape and heritage studies still have a good deal to learn from further conversation. In particular, the paper explores how a heritage sensibility might provide some supportive critical purchase for some recent work within landscape studies that draws on phenomenological and non-representational theories. Thus, the paper sets out the co-ordinates of how work within landscape studies and heritage studies can move forward through an interdisciplinary dialogue.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 911

EP - 924

JO - Landscape Research

JF - Landscape Research

SN - 0142-6397

IS - 8

M1 - DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2014.967668

ER -