Aarhus Universitets segl

David Charles Harvey

Heritage and scale: settings, boundaries and relations

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Heritage and scale: settings, boundaries and relations. / Harvey, David.
I: International Journal of Heritage Studies, Bind 21, Nr. 6, 2015, s. 577-593.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

Harvey, D 2015, 'Heritage and scale: settings, boundaries and relations', International Journal of Heritage Studies, bind 21, nr. 6, s. 577-593.

APA

Harvey, D. (2015). Heritage and scale: settings, boundaries and relations. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(6), 577-593.

CBE

Harvey D. 2015. Heritage and scale: settings, boundaries and relations. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 21(6):577-593.

MLA

Harvey, David. "Heritage and scale: settings, boundaries and relations". International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2015, 21(6). 577-593.

Vancouver

Harvey D. Heritage and scale: settings, boundaries and relations. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2015;21(6):577-593.

Author

Harvey, David. / Heritage and scale: settings, boundaries and relations. I: International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2015 ; Bind 21, Nr. 6. s. 577-593.

Bibtex

@article{3b99f29bf75d40aa8880f023c7032a83,
title = "Heritage and scale: settings, boundaries and relations",
abstract = "While recent years have seen increasing interest in the geographies of heritage,very few scholars have interrogated the difference that scale makes. Indeed, in aworld in which the nation state appears to be on the wane, the process of articulatingheritage on whatever scale – whether of individuals and communities,towns and cities, regions, nations, continents or globally – becomes ever moreimportant. Partly reflecting this crisis of the national container, researchers havesought opportunities both through processes of {\textquoteleft}downscaling{\textquoteright}, towards community, family and even personal forms of heritage, as well as {\textquoteleft}upscaling{\textquoteright}, towards a universal understanding of heritage. While such work has had critical impact within prescribed scalar boundaries, we need to build a theoretical understanding of what an emergent relationship between heritage and scale does within the context of dynamic power relations. This paper examines how heritage is produced and practised, consumed and experienced, managed and deployed at a variety of scales, exploring how notions of scale, territory and boundedness have a profound effect on the heritage process. Drawing on the work of Doreen Massey and others, the paper considers how the heritage–scale relationship can be articulated as a process of openness, pluralism and relationality.",
author = "David Harvey",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "577--593",
journal = "International Journal of Heritage Studies",
issn = "1352-7258",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heritage and scale: settings, boundaries and relations

AU - Harvey, David

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - While recent years have seen increasing interest in the geographies of heritage,very few scholars have interrogated the difference that scale makes. Indeed, in aworld in which the nation state appears to be on the wane, the process of articulatingheritage on whatever scale – whether of individuals and communities,towns and cities, regions, nations, continents or globally – becomes ever moreimportant. Partly reflecting this crisis of the national container, researchers havesought opportunities both through processes of ‘downscaling’, towards community, family and even personal forms of heritage, as well as ‘upscaling’, towards a universal understanding of heritage. While such work has had critical impact within prescribed scalar boundaries, we need to build a theoretical understanding of what an emergent relationship between heritage and scale does within the context of dynamic power relations. This paper examines how heritage is produced and practised, consumed and experienced, managed and deployed at a variety of scales, exploring how notions of scale, territory and boundedness have a profound effect on the heritage process. Drawing on the work of Doreen Massey and others, the paper considers how the heritage–scale relationship can be articulated as a process of openness, pluralism and relationality.

AB - While recent years have seen increasing interest in the geographies of heritage,very few scholars have interrogated the difference that scale makes. Indeed, in aworld in which the nation state appears to be on the wane, the process of articulatingheritage on whatever scale – whether of individuals and communities,towns and cities, regions, nations, continents or globally – becomes ever moreimportant. Partly reflecting this crisis of the national container, researchers havesought opportunities both through processes of ‘downscaling’, towards community, family and even personal forms of heritage, as well as ‘upscaling’, towards a universal understanding of heritage. While such work has had critical impact within prescribed scalar boundaries, we need to build a theoretical understanding of what an emergent relationship between heritage and scale does within the context of dynamic power relations. This paper examines how heritage is produced and practised, consumed and experienced, managed and deployed at a variety of scales, exploring how notions of scale, territory and boundedness have a profound effect on the heritage process. Drawing on the work of Doreen Massey and others, the paper considers how the heritage–scale relationship can be articulated as a process of openness, pluralism and relationality.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 577

EP - 593

JO - International Journal of Heritage Studies

JF - International Journal of Heritage Studies

SN - 1352-7258

IS - 6

ER -