Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Chris Kjeldsen

How do private entrepreneurs transform local social capital into economic capital? Four case studies from rural Denmark

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

How do private entrepreneurs transform local social capital into economic capital? Four case studies from rural Denmark. / Svendsen, Gunnar Lind Haase; Kjeldsen, Chris; Noe, Egon.

I: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Bind 39, Nr. 6, 2010, s. 631-644.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Svendsen, Gunnar Lind Haase ; Kjeldsen, Chris ; Noe, Egon. / How do private entrepreneurs transform local social capital into economic capital? Four case studies from rural Denmark. I: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 2010 ; Bind 39, Nr. 6. s. 631-644.

Bibtex

@article{980a429064bd11df8b17000ea68e967b,
title = "How do private entrepreneurs transform local social capital into economic capital? Four case studies from rural Denmark",
abstract = "In economic sociology, Bourdieu{\textquoteright}s neo-capital theory (Bourdieu, 1986) has regularly been applied by sociologists, who reject the rational action theory (Anheier et al., 1995). However, we claim that Bourdieu{\textquoteright}s key finding that forms of tangible and intangible capital (e.g. physical, economic, social, symbolic) are being perpetually accumulated and converted by individuals can best be explained within a rational action framework. This framework should be seen as modified by specific social structures (Coleman, 1988) and, hence, characterized by uncertainty and risky investments. Methodologically, we think that the {\textquoteleft}laws of conversion{\textquoteright} (Bourdieu, 1986:252-255) can best be observed at the micro level, by analyzing specific strings of capital conversion in time and space. Therefore, drawing on in-depth interviews with four private entrepreneurs in rural Denmark we try to analyze rational capital accumulation, usage and conversion, with special attention to social and economic capital. The question becomes: How do local entrepreneurs transform social capital into economic capital? We find that social capital is the {\textquoteleft}master capital{\textquoteright}, which gives access to the other forms of capital, including economic capital. Theoretically, we apply a simple Prisoner{\textquoteright}s Dilemma model on four different cases. This in order to explain why one entrepreneur succeeds in capitalizing social capital by establishing profitable win-win cooperation with other local and regional entrepreneurs, and why others don{\textquoteright}t.",
keywords = "Forms of capital; social capital; economic capital; private entrepreneurs; local communities; repeated Prisoner{\textquoteright}s Dilemma game; rural Denmark; Bourdieu",
author = "Svendsen, {Gunnar Lind Haase} and Chris Kjeldsen and Egon Noe",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1016/j.socec.2010.06.012",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "631--644",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics",
issn = "2214-8043",
publisher = "Elsevier BV North-Holland",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do private entrepreneurs transform local social capital into economic capital? Four case studies from rural Denmark

AU - Svendsen, Gunnar Lind Haase

AU - Kjeldsen, Chris

AU - Noe, Egon

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - In economic sociology, Bourdieu’s neo-capital theory (Bourdieu, 1986) has regularly been applied by sociologists, who reject the rational action theory (Anheier et al., 1995). However, we claim that Bourdieu’s key finding that forms of tangible and intangible capital (e.g. physical, economic, social, symbolic) are being perpetually accumulated and converted by individuals can best be explained within a rational action framework. This framework should be seen as modified by specific social structures (Coleman, 1988) and, hence, characterized by uncertainty and risky investments. Methodologically, we think that the ‘laws of conversion’ (Bourdieu, 1986:252-255) can best be observed at the micro level, by analyzing specific strings of capital conversion in time and space. Therefore, drawing on in-depth interviews with four private entrepreneurs in rural Denmark we try to analyze rational capital accumulation, usage and conversion, with special attention to social and economic capital. The question becomes: How do local entrepreneurs transform social capital into economic capital? We find that social capital is the ‘master capital’, which gives access to the other forms of capital, including economic capital. Theoretically, we apply a simple Prisoner’s Dilemma model on four different cases. This in order to explain why one entrepreneur succeeds in capitalizing social capital by establishing profitable win-win cooperation with other local and regional entrepreneurs, and why others don’t.

AB - In economic sociology, Bourdieu’s neo-capital theory (Bourdieu, 1986) has regularly been applied by sociologists, who reject the rational action theory (Anheier et al., 1995). However, we claim that Bourdieu’s key finding that forms of tangible and intangible capital (e.g. physical, economic, social, symbolic) are being perpetually accumulated and converted by individuals can best be explained within a rational action framework. This framework should be seen as modified by specific social structures (Coleman, 1988) and, hence, characterized by uncertainty and risky investments. Methodologically, we think that the ‘laws of conversion’ (Bourdieu, 1986:252-255) can best be observed at the micro level, by analyzing specific strings of capital conversion in time and space. Therefore, drawing on in-depth interviews with four private entrepreneurs in rural Denmark we try to analyze rational capital accumulation, usage and conversion, with special attention to social and economic capital. The question becomes: How do local entrepreneurs transform social capital into economic capital? We find that social capital is the ‘master capital’, which gives access to the other forms of capital, including economic capital. Theoretically, we apply a simple Prisoner’s Dilemma model on four different cases. This in order to explain why one entrepreneur succeeds in capitalizing social capital by establishing profitable win-win cooperation with other local and regional entrepreneurs, and why others don’t.

KW - Forms of capital; social capital; economic capital; private entrepreneurs; local communities; repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma game; rural Denmark; Bourdieu

U2 - 10.1016/j.socec.2010.06.012

DO - 10.1016/j.socec.2010.06.012

M3 - Journal article

VL - 39

SP - 631

EP - 644

JO - Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics

JF - Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics

SN - 2214-8043

IS - 6

ER -