A.S Niklassen

Danish Validation of a Retronasal Olfactory Powder Test and Development of a Novel Quick Retronasal Olfactory Test

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Danish Validation of a Retronasal Olfactory Powder Test and Development of a Novel Quick Retronasal Olfactory Test. / Niklassen, Andreas Steenholt; Sakthivel, Sukanya; Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck et al.
I: International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, Bind 26, Nr. 4, 10.2022, s. e615-e623.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Niklassen AS, Sakthivel S, Fjaeldstad AW, Ovesen T. Danish Validation of a Retronasal Olfactory Powder Test and Development of a Novel Quick Retronasal Olfactory Test. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology. 2022 okt.;26(4):e615-e623. Epub 2022 feb. 22. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740597

Author

Niklassen, Andreas Steenholt ; Sakthivel, Sukanya ; Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck et al. / Danish Validation of a Retronasal Olfactory Powder Test and Development of a Novel Quick Retronasal Olfactory Test. I: International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology. 2022 ; Bind 26, Nr. 4. s. e615-e623.

Bibtex

@article{5ffc4611477a4f6faf503e2beb567592,
title = "Danish Validation of a Retronasal Olfactory Powder Test and Development of a Novel Quick Retronasal Olfactory Test",
abstract = "Introduction Quality of life is closely linked to retronasal olfactory function. Familiarity with odors vary, so tests need validation. Testing can be time-consuming, so a quick test and a thorough test are needed for clinical and research settings.Objectives The objectives of this study were to validate the original retronasal powder olfactory test in a Danish population and to develop a novel quick retronasal test for easy application.Methods Ninety-seven participants were included in the study, 59 healthy controls and 38 patients with olfactory impairment. The retronasal test was modified by substituting unfamiliar odors and descriptors and validated with a criterion of correct identification rate of 50% in the original test and 90% in the quick test. Items with over 90% correct identification rate in the modified original test were included in the quick test, resulting in a 10-item test.Results The modified retronasal olfactory test achieved good test characteristics, with a 10th percentile cut-off value of 13: sensitivity was 88.9%, specificity 83.0%, positive predictive value 78%, negative predictive value 91.7%, and the receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (ROC-AUC) was 0.86. The quick test achieved acceptable test characteristics, with a 10th percentile cut-off value of 8.2: sensitivity was 72.2%, specificity 90.6%, positive predictive value 83.9%, negative predictive value was 82.8%, and ROC-AUC 0.81.Conclusion Validation of both tests demonstrated satisfactory accuracy. We recommend the quick test for screening purposes, and the modified original version for a thorough evaluation. The tests are easily implemented as they are easy to understand and very affordable.",
keywords = "smell, olfaction disorders, anosmia, diagnosis, validation study, BULB VOLUME, ORTHONASAL, IDENTIFICATION, DISCRIMINATION, TASTE",
author = "Niklassen, {Andreas Steenholt} and Sukanya Sakthivel and Fjaeldstad, {Alexander Wieck} and Therese Ovesen",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1055/s-0041-1740597",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "e615--e623",
journal = "International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology",
issn = "1809-9777",
publisher = "Thieme Open",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Danish Validation of a Retronasal Olfactory Powder Test and Development of a Novel Quick Retronasal Olfactory Test

AU - Niklassen, Andreas Steenholt

AU - Sakthivel, Sukanya

AU - Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck

AU - Ovesen, Therese

PY - 2022/10

Y1 - 2022/10

N2 - Introduction Quality of life is closely linked to retronasal olfactory function. Familiarity with odors vary, so tests need validation. Testing can be time-consuming, so a quick test and a thorough test are needed for clinical and research settings.Objectives The objectives of this study were to validate the original retronasal powder olfactory test in a Danish population and to develop a novel quick retronasal test for easy application.Methods Ninety-seven participants were included in the study, 59 healthy controls and 38 patients with olfactory impairment. The retronasal test was modified by substituting unfamiliar odors and descriptors and validated with a criterion of correct identification rate of 50% in the original test and 90% in the quick test. Items with over 90% correct identification rate in the modified original test were included in the quick test, resulting in a 10-item test.Results The modified retronasal olfactory test achieved good test characteristics, with a 10th percentile cut-off value of 13: sensitivity was 88.9%, specificity 83.0%, positive predictive value 78%, negative predictive value 91.7%, and the receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (ROC-AUC) was 0.86. The quick test achieved acceptable test characteristics, with a 10th percentile cut-off value of 8.2: sensitivity was 72.2%, specificity 90.6%, positive predictive value 83.9%, negative predictive value was 82.8%, and ROC-AUC 0.81.Conclusion Validation of both tests demonstrated satisfactory accuracy. We recommend the quick test for screening purposes, and the modified original version for a thorough evaluation. The tests are easily implemented as they are easy to understand and very affordable.

AB - Introduction Quality of life is closely linked to retronasal olfactory function. Familiarity with odors vary, so tests need validation. Testing can be time-consuming, so a quick test and a thorough test are needed for clinical and research settings.Objectives The objectives of this study were to validate the original retronasal powder olfactory test in a Danish population and to develop a novel quick retronasal test for easy application.Methods Ninety-seven participants were included in the study, 59 healthy controls and 38 patients with olfactory impairment. The retronasal test was modified by substituting unfamiliar odors and descriptors and validated with a criterion of correct identification rate of 50% in the original test and 90% in the quick test. Items with over 90% correct identification rate in the modified original test were included in the quick test, resulting in a 10-item test.Results The modified retronasal olfactory test achieved good test characteristics, with a 10th percentile cut-off value of 13: sensitivity was 88.9%, specificity 83.0%, positive predictive value 78%, negative predictive value 91.7%, and the receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (ROC-AUC) was 0.86. The quick test achieved acceptable test characteristics, with a 10th percentile cut-off value of 8.2: sensitivity was 72.2%, specificity 90.6%, positive predictive value 83.9%, negative predictive value was 82.8%, and ROC-AUC 0.81.Conclusion Validation of both tests demonstrated satisfactory accuracy. We recommend the quick test for screening purposes, and the modified original version for a thorough evaluation. The tests are easily implemented as they are easy to understand and very affordable.

KW - smell

KW - olfaction disorders

KW - anosmia

KW - diagnosis

KW - validation study

KW - BULB VOLUME

KW - ORTHONASAL

KW - IDENTIFICATION

KW - DISCRIMINATION

KW - TASTE

U2 - 10.1055/s-0041-1740597

DO - 10.1055/s-0041-1740597

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36405477

VL - 26

SP - e615-e623

JO - International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology

JF - International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology

SN - 1809-9777

IS - 4

ER -