Anne Høy Seemann Vestergaard

Socioeconomic inequality in drug reimbursement during end-of-life care: A nationwide study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Socioeconomic inequality in drug reimbursement during end-of-life care : A nationwide study. / Daugaard, Cecilie; Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern; Vestergaard, Anne Høy Seeman et al.

I: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Bind 73, Nr. 5, 2019, s. 435-442.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Daugaard C, Neergaard MA, Vestergaard AHS, Nielsen MK, Johnsen SP. Socioeconomic inequality in drug reimbursement during end-of-life care: A nationwide study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2019;73(5):435-442. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211580

Author

Bibtex

@article{f17dd471abf24186a28b42072e272016,
title = "Socioeconomic inequality in drug reimbursement during end-of-life care: A nationwide study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In Denmark, patients who are terminally ill have the right to drug reimbursement due to terminal illness (DRTI). DRTI, a proxy marker of planned end-of-life care, is intended to be equally accessible regardless of socioeconomic position. This study examined social and socioeconomic differences in DRTI among Danish patients who are terminally ill.METHODS: This cross-sectional study based on individual-level nationwide data included all patients dying from cancer, dementia, ischaemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic liver disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes or stroke in 2006-2015 (n=307 188). We analysed associations between social and socioeconomic position (education, income, cohabiting status, migrant status and employment) and DRTI. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% CIs were estimated using log-linear models adjusted for age, gender, comorbidity, cause of death and residence.RESULTS: Overall, 27.9% of patients received DRTI (n=85 616). A substantial difference in likelihood of receiving DRTI was observed among patients with a social and socioeconomic profile associated with the highest versus lowest probability of DRTI (adjusted PR 1.44, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.75). The probability of DRTI was higher among patients with high income compared with low income (adjusted PR 1.22, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.26). Also, living with a partner and being immigrant or descendant of such were associated with higher probability of DRTI compared with living alone and of Danish origin, whereas employment was associated with lower probability of DRTI compared with retirement.CONCLUSION: Social and socioeconomic position was associated with the likelihood of receiving DRTI, which indicates that planned end-of-life care is not equally accessible in Denmark.",
keywords = "access to healthcare, epidemiology, palliative care, social inequalities, socioeconomic",
author = "Cecilie Daugaard and Neergaard, {Mette Asbjoern} and Vestergaard, {Anne H{\o}y Seeman} and Nielsen, {Mette Kj{\ae}rgaard} and Johnsen, {S{\o}ren Paaske}",
note = "{\textcopyright} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1136/jech-2018-211580",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "435--442",
journal = "Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health",
issn = "0143-005X",
publisher = "B M J Group",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socioeconomic inequality in drug reimbursement during end-of-life care

T2 - A nationwide study

AU - Daugaard, Cecilie

AU - Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern

AU - Vestergaard, Anne Høy Seeman

AU - Nielsen, Mette Kjærgaard

AU - Johnsen, Søren Paaske

N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - BACKGROUND: In Denmark, patients who are terminally ill have the right to drug reimbursement due to terminal illness (DRTI). DRTI, a proxy marker of planned end-of-life care, is intended to be equally accessible regardless of socioeconomic position. This study examined social and socioeconomic differences in DRTI among Danish patients who are terminally ill.METHODS: This cross-sectional study based on individual-level nationwide data included all patients dying from cancer, dementia, ischaemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic liver disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes or stroke in 2006-2015 (n=307 188). We analysed associations between social and socioeconomic position (education, income, cohabiting status, migrant status and employment) and DRTI. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% CIs were estimated using log-linear models adjusted for age, gender, comorbidity, cause of death and residence.RESULTS: Overall, 27.9% of patients received DRTI (n=85 616). A substantial difference in likelihood of receiving DRTI was observed among patients with a social and socioeconomic profile associated with the highest versus lowest probability of DRTI (adjusted PR 1.44, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.75). The probability of DRTI was higher among patients with high income compared with low income (adjusted PR 1.22, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.26). Also, living with a partner and being immigrant or descendant of such were associated with higher probability of DRTI compared with living alone and of Danish origin, whereas employment was associated with lower probability of DRTI compared with retirement.CONCLUSION: Social and socioeconomic position was associated with the likelihood of receiving DRTI, which indicates that planned end-of-life care is not equally accessible in Denmark.

AB - BACKGROUND: In Denmark, patients who are terminally ill have the right to drug reimbursement due to terminal illness (DRTI). DRTI, a proxy marker of planned end-of-life care, is intended to be equally accessible regardless of socioeconomic position. This study examined social and socioeconomic differences in DRTI among Danish patients who are terminally ill.METHODS: This cross-sectional study based on individual-level nationwide data included all patients dying from cancer, dementia, ischaemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic liver disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes or stroke in 2006-2015 (n=307 188). We analysed associations between social and socioeconomic position (education, income, cohabiting status, migrant status and employment) and DRTI. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% CIs were estimated using log-linear models adjusted for age, gender, comorbidity, cause of death and residence.RESULTS: Overall, 27.9% of patients received DRTI (n=85 616). A substantial difference in likelihood of receiving DRTI was observed among patients with a social and socioeconomic profile associated with the highest versus lowest probability of DRTI (adjusted PR 1.44, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.75). The probability of DRTI was higher among patients with high income compared with low income (adjusted PR 1.22, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.26). Also, living with a partner and being immigrant or descendant of such were associated with higher probability of DRTI compared with living alone and of Danish origin, whereas employment was associated with lower probability of DRTI compared with retirement.CONCLUSION: Social and socioeconomic position was associated with the likelihood of receiving DRTI, which indicates that planned end-of-life care is not equally accessible in Denmark.

KW - access to healthcare

KW - epidemiology

KW - palliative care

KW - social inequalities

KW - socioeconomic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061087159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/jech-2018-211580

DO - 10.1136/jech-2018-211580

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30711916

VL - 73

SP - 435

EP - 442

JO - Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health

JF - Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health

SN - 0143-005X

IS - 5

ER -